Talk:Nebraska Supreme Court: Difference between revisions
→Article Review - for Class: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* What is missing? By the way, please note that there are bare-bones drafts for all missing former justices at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States state supreme court justices#Nebraska]]. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 17:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC) |
* What is missing? By the way, please note that there are bare-bones drafts for all missing former justices at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States state supreme court justices#Nebraska]]. [[User:BD2412|<font style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</font>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 17:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Article Review == |
|||
This is very well written and you do a good job of laying out all of your information, which covers your topic well. The History section could be clarified a little bit, and you need a few more sources to back up your information. Overall, I think this is a well written article and its interesting that you found so much information that wasn't on wiki yet. [[User:Azhusker100.8|Azhusker100.8]] ([[User talk:Azhusker100.8|talk]]) 02:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
This is very well written and you do a good job of laying out all of your information, which covers your topic well. The History section could be clarified a little bit, and you need a few more sources to back up your information. Overall, I think this is a well written article and its interesting that you found so much information that wasn't on wiki yet. [[User:Azhusker100.8|Azhusker100.8]] ([[User talk:Azhusker100.8|talk]]) 02:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:33, 29 March 2016
Law Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Archeryeverett, Azhusker100.8.
Stephanie Stacy
the list of current justices is out of date.Toyokuni3 (talk) 03:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- What is missing? By the way, please note that there are bare-bones drafts for all missing former justices at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States state supreme court justices#Nebraska. bd2412 T 17:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Article Review
This is very well written and you do a good job of laying out all of your information, which covers your topic well. The History section could be clarified a little bit, and you need a few more sources to back up your information. Overall, I think this is a well written article and its interesting that you found so much information that wasn't on wiki yet. Azhusker100.8 (talk) 02:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Article Review - for Class
The history section was rather well written. It is kind of disappointing that you only wrote the two paragraphs. As Azhusker100.8 mentioned, your section could use a few more links and sources to verify the information. Having one source for this section wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that you only wrote that small section, and therefore more research should be done to increase its size and quality. The section itself was written with proper Wikipedia formatting and language and that is very commendable. Archeryeverett (talk) 02:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)