Jump to content

Illustrious-class aircraft carrier: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
removed edit as irrelevant to article. Comparison with USN carriers are only to establish that the USN used a permanent deck park,
Undid revision 718270142 by Damwiki1 (talk) It is relevant because doctrine mattered and what I posted earlier showed a much smaller vessel then the RN armored carriers carry more and larger aircr
Line 63: Line 63:
The ''Illustrious'' class was designed within the restrictions of the [[Second London Naval Treaty]], which limited carrier size to an upper limit of 23,000 tons. They were different in conception to the Royal Navy's only modern carrier at the time, their predecessor [[HMS Ark Royal (91)|HMS ''Ark Royal'']], and what may be described as their nearest American contemporaries, the [[Yorktown class aircraft carrier|''Yorktown'']] and [[Essex class aircraft carrier|''Essex'']] class carriers. The ''Illustrious'' class followed the ''Yorktown'' but preceded the ''Essex''.
The ''Illustrious'' class was designed within the restrictions of the [[Second London Naval Treaty]], which limited carrier size to an upper limit of 23,000 tons. They were different in conception to the Royal Navy's only modern carrier at the time, their predecessor [[HMS Ark Royal (91)|HMS ''Ark Royal'']], and what may be described as their nearest American contemporaries, the [[Yorktown class aircraft carrier|''Yorktown'']] and [[Essex class aircraft carrier|''Essex'']] class carriers. The ''Illustrious'' class followed the ''Yorktown'' but preceded the ''Essex''.


Where other designs emphasised large air groups as the primary means of defence, the ''Illustrious'' class relied on their [[anti-aircraft gun|anti-aircraft armament]] and the passive defence provided by an [[Comparison of armoured to unarmoured flight deck designs|armoured]] [[Flight deck#Armored decks|flight deck]] for survival; resulting in a reduced aircraft complement. Other carriers had armour carried on lower decks (e.g. the hangar deck or main deck); the unprotected flight deck and the hangar below it formed part of the [[superstructure]], and were unprotected against even small bombs. However, the hangar could be made larger and thus more aircraft could be carried, but the differences in aircraft capacity between these carriers and their United States Navy (USN) counterparts is largely due to the USN's operational doctrine, which allowed for a permanent deck park of aircraft to augment their hangar capacity.<ref>Friedman, pp.18-19.</ref><ref>Hone, Friedman, Mandeles, ''British and American Carrier Development, 1919–1941'', p125:'' "The 1931 edition of "Progress in Tactics" included a section on foreign tactics, including operating practices. The U.S. portion mentioned that "the number of aircraft in carriers is proportionately much higher than in our Navy, largely due to the practice of storing some aircraft permanently on deck."''</ref> ''Illustrious's'' hangar was 82%<ref>Friedman, in his works on RN (p.154) and USN (P.392), aircraft carriers states that Enterprise's hangar measured 546 feet x 63 feet versus 456 x 62 feet for the Illustrious class, therefore Illustrious' hangar had 82% of Enterprise's hangar capacity.</ref> as large as [[USS Enterprise (CV-6)|''USS Enterprise'']]'s but ''Enterprise'' typically carried 30% of her aircraft capacity in her deck park. ''Indomitable's'' two hangars were actually larger than ''Enterprise's'' but she carried fewer aircraft because she did not have a large permanent deck park. In 1944/45 RN carriers began to carry a permanent deck park of similar size to their USN counterparts and this increased their aircraft complement to an eventual 57 aircraft in the single hangar carriers and up to 81 in the double hangar, 23,400 ton [[Implacable class aircraft carrier|Implacable]] design, compared to 90–110 for the 27,500 ton US ''Essex'' class.<ref>Friedman 1988, p. 145</ref><ref>''USS Bennington'', ''Action Report, OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE OCCUPATION OF OKINAWA INCLUDING STRIKE AGAINST KANOYA AIRFIELD, KYUSHU. 28 May to 10 June 1945'', p.18. On June 05 1945, ''USS Bennington'' reported that her maximum hangar capacity was 51 aircraft, 15 SB2Cs and 36 F4Us, and that 52 were carried as a deck park. At that time she carried 15 TBMs, 15 SB2Cs and the rest were a mix of F6Fs and F4Us. She was prompted to utilize, and report on, her maximum hangar storage due to a Typhoon.</ref>
Where other designs emphasised large air groups as the primary means of defence, the ''Illustrious'' class relied on their [[anti-aircraft gun|anti-aircraft armament]] and the passive defence provided by an [[Comparison of armoured to unarmoured flight deck designs|armoured]] [[Flight deck#Armored decks|flight deck]] for survival; resulting in a reduced aircraft complement. Other carriers had armour carried on lower decks (e.g. the hangar deck or main deck); the unprotected flight deck and the hangar below it formed part of the [[superstructure]], and were unprotected against even small bombs. However, the hangar could be made larger and thus more aircraft could be carried, but the differences in aircraft capacity between these carriers and their United States Navy (USN) counterparts is largely due to the USN's operational doctrine, which allowed for a permanent deck park of aircraft to augment their hangar capacity.<ref>Friedman, pp.18-19.</ref><ref>Hone, Friedman, Mandeles, ''British and American Carrier Development, 1919–1941'', p125:'' "The 1931 edition of "Progress in Tactics" included a section on foreign tactics, including operating practices. The U.S. portion mentioned that "the number of aircraft in carriers is proportionately much higher than in our Navy, largely due to the practice of storing some aircraft permanently on deck."''</ref> ''Illustrious's'' hangar was 82%<ref>Friedman, in his works on RN (p.154) and USN (P.392), aircraft carriers states that Enterprise's hangar measured 546 feet x 63 feet versus 456 x 62 feet for the Illustrious class, therefore Illustrious' hangar had 82% of Enterprise's hangar capacity.</ref> as large as [[USS Enterprise (CV-6)|''USS Enterprise'']]'s but ''Enterprise'' typically carried 30% of her aircraft capacity in her deck park. ''Indomitable's'' two hangars were actually larger than ''Enterprise's'' but she carried fewer aircraft because she did not have a large permanent deck park. In 1944/45 RN carriers began to carry a permanent deck park of similar size to their USN counterparts and this increased their aircraft complement to an eventual 57 aircraft in the single hangar carriers and up to 81 in the double hangar, 23,400 ton [[Implacable class aircraft carrier|Implacable]] design, compared to 90–110 for the 27,500 ton US ''Essex'' class.<ref>Friedman 1988, p. 145</ref><ref>''USS Bennington'', ''Action Report, OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE OCCUPATION OF OKINAWA INCLUDING STRIKE AGAINST KANOYA AIRFIELD, KYUSHU. 28 May to 10 June 1945'', p.18. On June 05 1945, ''USS Bennington'' reported that her maximum hangar capacity was 51 aircraft, 15 SB2Cs and 36 F4Us, and that 52 were carried as a deck park. At that time she carried 15 TBMs, 15 SB2Cs and the rest were a mix of F6Fs and F4Us. She was prompted to utilize, and report on, her maximum hangar storage due to a Typhoon.</ref>However the 21,000 ton standard USS Enterprise in 1943 after her refit carried 38 non-folding winged SBD-5, 32 F6F-3 and 20 TBF-1 Avengers according to the September 14,1943 Navy and Heritage Command: Location of U.S. Naval Aircraft while the HMS Implacable carried in late 1945 48 Seafire III, 12 Fireflies and 21 TBM Avengers according to www.armouredcarriers.com part 4 Implacable and indefatigable so the smaller pre-war USS Enterprise was still able to carry 9 more of larger footprint & heavier aircraft,38 of whch the SBD-5 didn't have folding wings whilst all of Implacables embarked air group had folding wings.This further highlights doctrinal and operational differences between the RN and USN.


In the ''Illustrious'' class, armour was carried at the flight deck level—which became the strength deck—and formed an armoured box-like hangar that was an integral part of the ship's structure. However, to make this possible without increasing the displacement it was necessary to significantly reduce the size and headroom of the hangar. The later three vessels, ''Indomitable'', ''Indefatigable'' and ''Implacable'', had re-designed two-level hangars which enabled them to carry larger air groups than the original design. The size of the air wings was also increased by using outriggers and deck parks. The original design was for 36 aircraft, but eventually the vessels operated with a complement of up to 72 aircraft. However, the smaller overhead height of the hangars (16&nbsp;ft (4.88 m) in the upper hangars and 14&nbsp;ft (4.27 m) in the later ships with lower hangars) compared unfavourably to the 17&nbsp;feet 3&nbsp;inches (5.3&nbsp;m) of the ''Essex'' class, 17&nbsp;ft 6&nbsp;inches (5.38&nbsp;m) in ''Enterprise'' and 20&nbsp;ft (6.10 m) in ''Saratoga''. This restricted operations with larger aircraft designs, particularly post-war.
In the ''Illustrious'' class, armour was carried at the flight deck level—which became the strength deck—and formed an armoured box-like hangar that was an integral part of the ship's structure. However, to make this possible without increasing the displacement it was necessary to significantly reduce the size and headroom of the hangar. The later three vessels, ''Indomitable'', ''Indefatigable'' and ''Implacable'', had re-designed two-level hangars which enabled them to carry larger air groups than the original design. The size of the air wings was also increased by using outriggers and deck parks. The original design was for 36 aircraft, but eventually the vessels operated with a complement of up to 72 aircraft. However, the smaller overhead height of the hangars (16&nbsp;ft (4.88 m) in the upper hangars and 14&nbsp;ft (4.27 m) in the later ships with lower hangars) compared unfavourably to the 17&nbsp;feet 3&nbsp;inches (5.3&nbsp;m) of the ''Essex'' class, 17&nbsp;ft 6&nbsp;inches (5.38&nbsp;m) in ''Enterprise'' and 20&nbsp;ft (6.10 m) in ''Saratoga''. This restricted operations with larger aircraft designs, particularly post-war.

Revision as of 17:25, 2 May 2016

HMS Illustrious
Class overview
BuildersVickers-Armstrongs (3), Harland & Wolff (1)
Operators Royal Navy
Preceded byHMS Ark Royal
Succeeded byImplacable class
SubclassesHMS Indomitable
In commission1940–1968
Planned6
Completed4
Scrapped4
General characteristics (Illustrious, as built)
TypeAircraft carrier
Displacement23,000 long tons (23,000 t) (standard)
Length
Beam95 ft 9 in (29.2 m)
Draught28 ft 10 in (8.8 m) (deep load)
Installed power
Propulsion
Speed30.5 knots (56.5 km/h; 35.1 mph)
Range10,700 nmi (19,800 km; 12,300 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)
Complement1,229
Sensors and
processing systems		1 × Type 79 early-warning radar
Armament
Armour
Aircraft carried36–57
Aviation facilities1 catapult

The Illustrious class was a class of aircraft carrier of the Royal Navy that included some of the most important British warships in World War II. They were laid down in the late 1930s as part of the rearmament of British forces in response to the emerging threats of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan.

The Illustrious class comprised four vessels: HM Ships Illustrious, Formidable, Victorious and Indomitable. The last of these was built to a modified design with a second, half-length, hangar deck below the main hangar deck. Each of these ships played a prominent part in the battles of World War II. Victorious took part in the pursuit of the German battleship Bismarck, Illustrious and Formidable played prominent parts in the battles in the Mediterranean during 1940 and 1941 and all three took part in the large actions of the British Pacific Fleet in 1945.

The later two ships of the Implacable class were also built to modified designs in order that they could carry larger air wings. Implacable and Indefatigable both had two hangar levels, albeit with a limited 14-foot (4.3 m) head room.

Design and concept

The Illustrious class was designed within the restrictions of the Second London Naval Treaty, which limited carrier size to an upper limit of 23,000 tons. They were different in conception to the Royal Navy's only modern carrier at the time, their predecessor HMS Ark Royal, and what may be described as their nearest American contemporaries, the Yorktown and Essex class carriers. The Illustrious class followed the Yorktown but preceded the Essex.

Where other designs emphasised large air groups as the primary means of defence, the Illustrious class relied on their anti-aircraft armament and the passive defence provided by an armoured flight deck for survival; resulting in a reduced aircraft complement. Other carriers had armour carried on lower decks (e.g. the hangar deck or main deck); the unprotected flight deck and the hangar below it formed part of the superstructure, and were unprotected against even small bombs. However, the hangar could be made larger and thus more aircraft could be carried, but the differences in aircraft capacity between these carriers and their United States Navy (USN) counterparts is largely due to the USN's operational doctrine, which allowed for a permanent deck park of aircraft to augment their hangar capacity.[1][2] Illustrious's hangar was 82%[3] as large as USS Enterprise's but Enterprise typically carried 30% of her aircraft capacity in her deck park. Indomitable's two hangars were actually larger than Enterprise's but she carried fewer aircraft because she did not have a large permanent deck park. In 1944/45 RN carriers began to carry a permanent deck park of similar size to their USN counterparts and this increased their aircraft complement to an eventual 57 aircraft in the single hangar carriers and up to 81 in the double hangar, 23,400 ton Implacable design, compared to 90–110 for the 27,500 ton US Essex class.[4][5]However the 21,000 ton standard USS Enterprise in 1943 after her refit carried 38 non-folding winged SBD-5, 32 F6F-3 and 20 TBF-1 Avengers according to the September 14,1943 Navy and Heritage Command: Location of U.S. Naval Aircraft while the HMS Implacable carried in late 1945 48 Seafire III, 12 Fireflies and 21 TBM Avengers according to www.armouredcarriers.com part 4 Implacable and indefatigable so the smaller pre-war USS Enterprise was still able to carry 9 more of larger footprint & heavier aircraft,38 of whch the SBD-5 didn't have folding wings whilst all of Implacables embarked air group had folding wings.This further highlights doctrinal and operational differences between the RN and USN.

In the Illustrious class, armour was carried at the flight deck level—which became the strength deck—and formed an armoured box-like hangar that was an integral part of the ship's structure. However, to make this possible without increasing the displacement it was necessary to significantly reduce the size and headroom of the hangar. The later three vessels, Indomitable, Indefatigable and Implacable, had re-designed two-level hangars which enabled them to carry larger air groups than the original design. The size of the air wings was also increased by using outriggers and deck parks. The original design was for 36 aircraft, but eventually the vessels operated with a complement of up to 72 aircraft. However, the smaller overhead height of the hangars (16 ft (4.88 m) in the upper hangars and 14 ft (4.27 m) in the later ships with lower hangars) compared unfavourably to the 17 feet 3 inches (5.3 m) of the Essex class, 17 ft 6 inches (5.38 m) in Enterprise and 20 ft (6.10 m) in Saratoga. This restricted operations with larger aircraft designs, particularly post-war.

This armour scheme was designed to withstand 1,000 pound bombs (and heavier bombs which struck at an angle); in the Home and Mediterranean theatres it was likely that the carriers would operate within the range of shore-based aircraft, which could carry heavier bombs than their carrier-based equivalents. The flight deck had an armoured thickness of 3 inches, closed by 4.5-inch sides and bulkheads. There were 3-inch strakes on either side extending from the box sides to the top edge of the main side belt, which was of 4.5 inches. The main belt protected the machinery, petrol stowage, magazines and aerial weapon stores. The lifts were placed outside the hangar, at either end, with access through sliding armoured doors in the end bulkheads.

Later in the war it was found that bombs which penetrated and detonated inside the armoured hangar could cause structural deformation, as the latter was an integral part of the ship's structure.

Pre-war doctrine held that the ship's own firepower, rather than its aircraft, were to be relied upon for protection, since in the absence of radar, fighters were unlikely to intercept incoming attackers before they could release their weapons. Accordingly, the Illustrious class was given an extremely heavy Anti-Aircraft armament. The armament was similar to Ark Royal with twin 4.5 inch turrets (in a new "between-decks" or countersunk design) arranged on the points of a quadrant. The guns were mounted sufficiently high so that they could fire across the decks; de-fuelled aircraft would be stowed in the hangar for protection during aerial attack. The Illustrious Class were fitted with four HACS controlled High Angle Director Towers, for fire control of her 4.5" guns. Illustrious pioneered the use of Radar to vector carrier borne fighters onto attacking or shadowing aircraft, and a Fairey Fulmar fighter from Illustrious achieved the first radar directed kill on 2 September 1940.[6]

Ships in class

Name Pennant Builder Ordered Laid down Launched Commissioned Fate
Illustrious subgroup
Illustrious 87 Vickers-Armstrongs, Barrow-in-Furness 13 April 1937 27 April 1937 5 April 1939 25 May 1940 Broken up at Gare Loch, 1956
Formidable 67 Harland & Wolff, Belfast 19 March 1937 17 June 1937 17 August 1939 24 November 1940 Broken up at Inverkeithing, 1953
Victorious 38 Vickers-Armstrongs, Wallsend 13 January 1937 4 May 1937 14 September 1939 14 May 1941 Broken up at Faslane, 1969
Indomitable subgroup
Indomitable 92 Vickers-Armstrongs, Barrow-in-Furness 6 July 1937 10 November 1937 26 March 1940 10 October 1941 Broken up at Faslane, 1955

Fate of the class

Victorious in 1959

All four early ships were hard worked during World War II, with Illustrious and Formidable suffering and surviving heavy damage. Like their contemporary USS Enterprise they fought a long and consuming war and despite significant overhauls and repair of battle damage, were worn out by 1946 and were scrapped in the mid-1950s. Due to a variety of factors including Britain's dire post war finances, and the consequent reductions in the size of the Royal Navy post war modernization was limited to just the last of the class; Victorious, which was given a massive eight-year-long reconstruction between 1950 and 1957 (to enable her to operate Cold War-era jet aircraft), was retired in 1968 after a minor fire. Indomitable was given an extensive refit, including new boilers, from 1948 to 1950, then served as flagship of the Home Fleet and also saw service in the Mediterranean. She suffered a hangar deck petrol explosion and fire in early 1953. She was placed in reserve after Queen Elizabeth II's October 1953 Coronation Review and was then scrapped in 1955.[7]

Notes

  1. ^ Friedman, pp.18-19.
  2. ^ Hone, Friedman, Mandeles, British and American Carrier Development, 1919–1941, p125: "The 1931 edition of "Progress in Tactics" included a section on foreign tactics, including operating practices. The U.S. portion mentioned that "the number of aircraft in carriers is proportionately much higher than in our Navy, largely due to the practice of storing some aircraft permanently on deck."
  3. ^ Friedman, in his works on RN (p.154) and USN (P.392), aircraft carriers states that Enterprise's hangar measured 546 feet x 63 feet versus 456 x 62 feet for the Illustrious class, therefore Illustrious' hangar had 82% of Enterprise's hangar capacity.
  4. ^ Friedman 1988, p. 145
  5. ^ USS Bennington, Action Report, OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE OCCUPATION OF OKINAWA INCLUDING STRIKE AGAINST KANOYA AIRFIELD, KYUSHU. 28 May to 10 June 1945, p.18. On June 05 1945, USS Bennington reported that her maximum hangar capacity was 51 aircraft, 15 SB2Cs and 36 F4Us, and that 52 were carried as a deck park. At that time she carried 15 TBMs, 15 SB2Cs and the rest were a mix of F6Fs and F4Us. She was prompted to utilize, and report on, her maximum hangar storage due to a Typhoon.
  6. ^ Thomas, Andrew, Royal Navy Aces of World War Two, p24.
  7. ^ Friedman, p.153.

References

  • Brown, David (1977). WWII Fact Files: Aircraft Carriers. New York: Arco Publishing. ISBN 0-668-04164-1.
  • Campbell, John (1985). Naval Weapons of World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-459-4.
  • Chesneau, Roger (1995). Aircraft Carriers of the World, 1914 to the Present: An Illustrated Encyclopedia (New, Revised ed.). Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-902-2.
  • Chesneau, Roger, ed. (1980). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946. Greenwich, UK: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-146-7.
  • Friedman, Norman (1988). British Carrier Aviation: The Evolution of the Ships and Their Aircraft. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-054-8.
  • Friedman, Norman (1983). U.S. Aircraft Carriers: An Illustrated Design History. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-739-9.
  • Hobbs, David (2013). British Aircraft Carriers: Design, Development and Service Histories. Barnsley, UK: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-138-0.
  • McCart, Neil (2000). The Illustrious & Implacable Classes of Aircraft Carrier 1940–1969. Cheltenham, UK: Fan Publications. ISBN 1-901225-04-6.
  • Rohwer, Jürgen (2005). Chronology of the War at Sea 1939-1945: The Naval History of World War Two (Third Rev ed.). Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-119-2.

Media related to Illustrious class aircraft carriers at Wikimedia Commons

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Illustrious-class_aircraft_carrier&oldid=718290137"