Jump to content

Talk:July 2016 Dhaka attack: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
header
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
:Now replaced by a news reference. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
:Now replaced by a news reference. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&amp;</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


== "Secularists" and "other Muslims" ==


It's entirely possible and there's an extensive historic precedent in there being Muslims who advocate for a secular society. The point being is that this article shouldn't imply that people in Bangladesh who advocate for secularism are atheistic or otherwise "not Muslim".

It's a relatively "small" objection but it's pretty relevant nonetheless. [[Special:Contributions/70.27.162.84|70.27.162.84]] ([[User talk:70.27.162.84|talk]]) 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:29, 2 July 2016

Template:Syrian Civil War sanctions

Twitter

Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. Fences&Windows 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now replaced by a news reference. Fences&Windows 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


"Secularists" and "other Muslims"

It's entirely possible and there's an extensive historic precedent in there being Muslims who advocate for a secular society. The point being is that this article shouldn't imply that people in Bangladesh who advocate for secularism are atheistic or otherwise "not Muslim".

It's a relatively "small" objection but it's pretty relevant nonetheless. 70.27.162.84 (talk) 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]