Talk:July 2016 Dhaka attack: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
header |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Now replaced by a news reference. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
:Now replaced by a news reference. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:#808080;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
== "Secularists" and "other Muslims" == |
|||
It's entirely possible and there's an extensive historic precedent in there being Muslims who advocate for a secular society. The point being is that this article shouldn't imply that people in Bangladesh who advocate for secularism are atheistic or otherwise "not Muslim". |
|||
It's a relatively "small" objection but it's pretty relevant nonetheless. [[Special:Contributions/70.27.162.84|70.27.162.84]] ([[User talk:70.27.162.84|talk]]) 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:29, 2 July 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the July 2016 Dhaka attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Template:Syrian Civil War sanctions
Twitter is not a good source to use in the middle of a terrorist attack. Claiming 20 dead off the back of a tweet is irresponsible and contributes to the spread of rumours. Fences&Windows 20:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Now replaced by a news reference. Fences&Windows 21:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
"Secularists" and "other Muslims"
It's entirely possible and there's an extensive historic precedent in there being Muslims who advocate for a secular society. The point being is that this article shouldn't imply that people in Bangladesh who advocate for secularism are atheistic or otherwise "not Muslim".
It's a relatively "small" objection but it's pretty relevant nonetheless. 70.27.162.84 (talk) 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)