Jump to content

User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man/Archive 1) (bot
Line 62: Line 62:


'''Note''': Having a username change ''after'' you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the [[WT:STiki|talk page]] page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.<br>
'''Note''': Having a username change ''after'' you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the [[WT:STiki|talk page]] page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.<br>

== Maybe I made a mistake ==

Maybe i made a mistake (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:83.232.236.169&redirect=no) if so not intentional. I did smth that was written to do on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard "to let all involved know" about posting on the notice board .. where I also posted the fact that unreliable NPOV things are stated on pages here. Wikipedia has a jungle of rules & set ways that not everyone knows how-to. Plus, also non native speakers look on en.wiki pages & this is not my native tongue.

Nevertheless if things are not right, also non-wikipedians should be able to state that it isn't. I do not have to register for that & it is because these kind of things that (a.o. I) do not WANT to be a user here. There are many agenda-pushers on wikipedia that get away with a lot of things, simply because they just keep on doing what theyre doing.

But it cannot be that on 1 page Wikipedia writes that Hitler ate meat (several dishes are mentioned even) but that he WAS an undisputed vegetarian. 1 + 1 cannot be 4, or 5 ... On the pages I have mentioned there are people with an agenda that want Hitler to have been a vegetarian; though if several of yr favorite dished had meat in it, you are NOT a vegetarian. I have no problem with Hitler being listed on that page, but when it is being disputed, he should be on the disputed list.

That is what I am trying to say, but I've 'met' this Betty Logan on wiki before: he/she has the agenda to push the idea that Hitler was vegetarian. So if people that have THEIR own agenda just keep shouting here that it is others who have the agenda, then it is so? Ridiculous! Again, a vegetarian will never choose to eat pigeons, liver, sausages etcetera (unless they'd be produced by Linda McCartney possibly). If yr doctors tell you it'd be better to not eat meat but you still do - it does NOT make you one. If the Reich's Minister of propagande is used as a reliable source, then Wiki should also publish that they were good to the Jews .. heyy even the Red Cross believed that at the time ..

So why is there no page stating that Josef Mengele was a vivisector? He did animal experiments before, during as well as after WW2; nothing of which is being communicated on the wiki Mengele page. Same thing. I can tell you by experience that vivisectionists do NOT want to be classified as being nazi's, whilst it were the vivisectionists who made the nazi's ban on vivisection go away (so who were worse - the nazi's or the vivisectors who also had the nazis pay the big pharma vivisectionists for experimenting on people? They sent their invoices to Mengele to do so). Nevertheless Wiki also states that the Nazi's were antivisectionists; but you can NOT be an antivivisectionist when you perform animal experiments. Now what is not correct in that picture?

If you look at the history of the Edits, many people, also registered wikipedians, disputed, and also referenced, that Hitler actually was a vegetarian .. it simply cannot be that a few here (mainly Betty Logan with his/her agenda; on the Dutch wikipedia there are also several agenda-pushers that make other contributors even quit wikipedia because of these 'content-wars' by people who apparently have ALL the time to be on wikipedia all day and just delete other people's contributions) decide that a meat-eater was a vegetarian. Again, he should be on the disputed list. Hitler ate pigeons: NOT vegetarian; Hitler ate sausages: NOT vegetarian; Hitler ate liver dumplings (was his favorite dish!): NOT vegetarian.

And then a meat-eater tells me (I'm vegan) a meat eater was a vegetarian, UNdisputedly = ridiculous & not worthy of being in any kind of encyclopedia .. when my doctor tells me to eat meat but I don't, it does nott make me a meat-eater - it really is that simple.

Wikipedia cannot be taken seriously if he stays in that list on that page. As I wrote to Betty Logan yesterday: Wikipedia can also not write/state that pedofiles are nice to children simply because they 'like' children (yes I can say it since I have been abused as a child).
[[Special:Contributions/83.232.236.169|83.232.236.169]] ([[User talk:83.232.236.169|talk]]) 10:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:52, 9 August 2016

Talkback

Hello, Marvellous Spider-Man. You have new messages at KrakatoaKatie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nthep (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

c. tenuiflorus is a duplicate of the image on carduus pycnocephalus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susan Dunlap (talkcontribs) 20:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Felice Jankell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Swedish
Tatjana Vasiljeva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Latvian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Marvellous Spider-Man. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Sam Sailor Talk! 11:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Christian Coulson

He is openly gay, and his boyfriend is called Keith Edwards. This is accurate!

His boyfriend's Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/p/w6oe4EJhQh/

Christian is pictured on the right holding the iPhone, kissing his boyfriend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezyie (talkcontribs) 13:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Count Paris

Hello Marvellous Spider-Man , i noticed that you reverted revision on count paris page . i believe the one that suspected to have affair is lady capulet (juliet's mom) and tybalt , not juliet .. lady capulet mourn tybalt death twice ([1] where it said they have been up all night mourning Tybalt's death) while she even not mourn that hard when juliet fake her death ... also shown at [2] "lady capulet alone grieves in a lament; sorrow makes capulet and the nurse speechless 115.178.236.77 115.178.236.77 (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)115.178.236.77115.178.236.77 (talk) 14:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

9/11 Truth Movement

If you're going to make a change please supply the reason. Very rude to simply go ahead and delete a contribution. The page is 9/11 Truth Movement so what is your objection to including a list of truther groups? As you will see I undid your deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petra Liverani (talkcontribs) 10:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Marvellous Spider-Man, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Maybe I made a mistake

Maybe i made a mistake (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:83.232.236.169&redirect=no) if so not intentional. I did smth that was written to do on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard "to let all involved know" about posting on the notice board .. where I also posted the fact that unreliable NPOV things are stated on pages here. Wikipedia has a jungle of rules & set ways that not everyone knows how-to. Plus, also non native speakers look on en.wiki pages & this is not my native tongue.

Nevertheless if things are not right, also non-wikipedians should be able to state that it isn't. I do not have to register for that & it is because these kind of things that (a.o. I) do not WANT to be a user here. There are many agenda-pushers on wikipedia that get away with a lot of things, simply because they just keep on doing what theyre doing.

But it cannot be that on 1 page Wikipedia writes that Hitler ate meat (several dishes are mentioned even) but that he WAS an undisputed vegetarian. 1 + 1 cannot be 4, or 5 ... On the pages I have mentioned there are people with an agenda that want Hitler to have been a vegetarian; though if several of yr favorite dished had meat in it, you are NOT a vegetarian. I have no problem with Hitler being listed on that page, but when it is being disputed, he should be on the disputed list.

That is what I am trying to say, but I've 'met' this Betty Logan on wiki before: he/she has the agenda to push the idea that Hitler was vegetarian. So if people that have THEIR own agenda just keep shouting here that it is others who have the agenda, then it is so? Ridiculous! Again, a vegetarian will never choose to eat pigeons, liver, sausages etcetera (unless they'd be produced by Linda McCartney possibly). If yr doctors tell you it'd be better to not eat meat but you still do - it does NOT make you one. If the Reich's Minister of propagande is used as a reliable source, then Wiki should also publish that they were good to the Jews .. heyy even the Red Cross believed that at the time ..

So why is there no page stating that Josef Mengele was a vivisector? He did animal experiments before, during as well as after WW2; nothing of which is being communicated on the wiki Mengele page. Same thing. I can tell you by experience that vivisectionists do NOT want to be classified as being nazi's, whilst it were the vivisectionists who made the nazi's ban on vivisection go away (so who were worse - the nazi's or the vivisectors who also had the nazis pay the big pharma vivisectionists for experimenting on people? They sent their invoices to Mengele to do so). Nevertheless Wiki also states that the Nazi's were antivisectionists; but you can NOT be an antivivisectionist when you perform animal experiments. Now what is not correct in that picture?

If you look at the history of the Edits, many people, also registered wikipedians, disputed, and also referenced, that Hitler actually was a vegetarian .. it simply cannot be that a few here (mainly Betty Logan with his/her agenda; on the Dutch wikipedia there are also several agenda-pushers that make other contributors even quit wikipedia because of these 'content-wars' by people who apparently have ALL the time to be on wikipedia all day and just delete other people's contributions) decide that a meat-eater was a vegetarian. Again, he should be on the disputed list. Hitler ate pigeons: NOT vegetarian; Hitler ate sausages: NOT vegetarian; Hitler ate liver dumplings (was his favorite dish!): NOT vegetarian.

And then a meat-eater tells me (I'm vegan) a meat eater was a vegetarian, UNdisputedly = ridiculous & not worthy of being in any kind of encyclopedia .. when my doctor tells me to eat meat but I don't, it does nott make me a meat-eater - it really is that simple.

Wikipedia cannot be taken seriously if he stays in that list on that page. As I wrote to Betty Logan yesterday: Wikipedia can also not write/state that pedofiles are nice to children simply because they 'like' children (yes I can say it since I have been abused as a child). 83.232.236.169 (talk) 10:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ act III,1,1663 and act III,4
  2. ^ Shakespeare Survey, Volume 49 page 49