Talk:List of satirical news websites: Difference between revisions
→Table Entry: fix syntaxhighlighting error |
→Table Entry: fix last edit |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Copy and insert the following into the table as a starting point for a new entry in the main article. • [[User:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;">Sbmeirow</span>]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;White;">Talk</span>]] • 07:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
Copy and insert the following into the table as a starting point for a new entry in the main article. • [[User:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;">Sbmeirow</span>]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;White;">Talk</span>]] • 07:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
<source lang=moin> |
|||
<pre> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[]] |
| [[]] |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ? |
| ? |
||
| ? |
| ? |
||
</ |
</source> |
||
== HardDawn.com == |
== HardDawn.com == |
||
Revision as of 20:24, 4 September 2016
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Table Entry
Copy and insert the following into the table as a starting point for a new entry in the main article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 07:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|-
| [[]]
| {{URL||}}
| ?
| ?
HardDawn.com
While the content is pure nonsense yet fulfilling feed to the foolish, it is not a parody or satire site. The recent assignment of conspiracy to the death of SCOTUS Judge Scalia is being linked to bizarre theory involving Leonard Nimoy, the Obama administration and the Illuminati. This is being advocated by various extreme right-wing entities such as Alex Jone of Infowars and HardDawn. Recommend Wiki editors monitor this page for the near term and remove the HardDawn reference. Inclusion of this site as parody is incorrect and misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:363F:B15F:205A:580D:259F:FC9D (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I've been busy and just now removed it, not because of it's content, but instead because it doesn't have a Wikipedia article, which is a typical requirement for list type articles. It doesn't appear that you tried to fix the article, so why not? • Sbmeirow • Talk • 03:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)