Jump to content

Talk:Breast cancer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Breast cancer/Archive 3) (bot
Line 102: Line 102:


[[doi:10.1210/er.2015-1133]] [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 13:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
[[doi:10.1210/er.2015-1133]] [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 13:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

== Not about fondling. ==

Does mechanical trauma (powerful or repeatitive impacts) cause breast cancer? I remember hearing about that issue on radio and it was mentioned as a certainity rather than a risk factor, but can't find anything about the topic in this article? [[Special:Contributions/82.131.224.99|82.131.224.99]] ([[User talk:82.131.224.99|talk]]) 06:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:44, 23 October 2016

Template:Vital article

Former good article nomineeBreast cancer was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
June 29, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
WikiProject iconMedicine: Hematology-oncology / Translation / Pathology B‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).
This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconWomen's Health B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.


Doc James, Tagging 10 dead links using Checklinks. Left them unfixed. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The previous tool you were using however was not fixing them either. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Doc James, Checklinks does not fix them, it just finds them. The fixes are done manually then Checklinks inserts the fixes. I do not know of an automated tool for fixing dead refs. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 01:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Cyberpower678 has built one. It is going to be using Internet Archive. Not sure when a big run is going to begin. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully soon. There's a major flaw that needs to be fixed. It has fixed several thousand links on several thousand pages.—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 02:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
On the bright side, the engine has practically a 0% chance of fetching a bad archive at this point.
Then there's the task of installing a heuristic to detect untagged dead links.—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 02:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well thank you for tackling this :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James and C678:, one problem with Checklinks is it does not find dead subscription links; another problem is that it takes up to 18-months for links to have archived versions. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about Endocrine-resistant breast cancer

so where should we direct to ? - Rod57 (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source/comment Novel Agents Show Promise Against Endocrine-resistant Breast Cancer. July 2016. - Rod57 (talk) 11:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Breast cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Breast cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Breast cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lapatinib

Lapatinib has been used for breast cancer treatment (in combination with other substances), see for example a PubMed review article by Fleeman et al [1]. There is also one study on using a combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab for treating HER2 positive breast cancer [2] by Bundred et al and a PubMed article (not a review) by Blackwell et al on the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab [3]. Could it be worth mentioning lapatinib in this article, or would it be necessary to wait for (further) review articles?
--2A02:810D:D40:9910:2C2B:13B2:9B:8AC5 (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why does sleep-wake cycle disruption cause breast cancer

doi:10.1210/er.2015-1133 JFW | T@lk 13:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not about fondling.

Does mechanical trauma (powerful or repeatitive impacts) cause breast cancer? I remember hearing about that issue on radio and it was mentioned as a certainity rather than a risk factor, but can't find anything about the topic in this article? 82.131.224.99 (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]