Talk:Type 091 submarine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:25, 25 October 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Type 091 submarine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

China Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Chinese Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Non-encyclopedic wording

Discussing the inability of the sub to launch missiles while submerged, someone wrote, "This is a huge tactical drawback and makes a missile launch suicidal against most enemies." This is obviously strong, non-encyclopedic wording. The source cited states things very differently, saying the shortcomings "compromise [the subs'] operational effectiveness and their wartime utility against ASW-competent adversaries." I've changed the wording in the article to match this.67.68.47.206 (talk) 16:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another one decommissioned?

Sounds like another Han-class sub may have been decommissioned, although it's not clear which one: [1] Cfmdobbie (talk) 19:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Discussing the inability of the sub to launch missiles while submerged, someone wrote, "This is a huge tactical drawback and makes a missile launch suicidal against most enemies."  This is obviously strong, non-encyclopedic wording. The source cited states things very differently, saying the shortcomings "compromise [the subs'] operational effectiveness and their wartime utility against ASW-competent adversaries."  I've changed the wording in the article to match this.[[Special:Contributions/67.68.47.206|67.68.47.206]] ([[User talk:67.68.47.206|talk]]) 16:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
+== Another one decommissioned? ==
+Sounds like another ''Han''-class sub may have been decommissioned, although it's not clear which one: [http://www.janes.com/article/64724/china-s-first-nuclear-powered-submarine-decommissioned] [[User:Cfmdobbie|Cfmdobbie]] ([[User talk:Cfmdobbie|talk]]) 19:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)