Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Atlas: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:13, 10 November 2016

New Atlas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed by creator. Many refs that proves that company exists, but no refs to show notability. Cannot find reliable sources to show notability. There are several sources in the article but most of them are primary sources; the rest do not appear in-depth enough to indicate notability. Cannot find any coverage of the site itself. -- Darth Mike ^(talk) 15:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the publication was formerly called Gizmag -- Darth Mike ^(talk) 16:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article seems to exist only for promotional purposes. I don't see any indication of significant coverage in high-quality independent reliable sources. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback but I can assure you as the creator the intention of this piece isn't promotional, but to provide details on the long history of the business using Gizmodo as base structure to create the page. I will look to add a section on coverage with details on breaking news & additional notable sources. Will post here as soon as this has been updated, any further advice & guidance is greatly appreciated. —Coast123 (talk) 9:30, 10 November 2016 (GMT)

Revision as of 18:38, 9 November 2016 edit BarrelProof (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers 98,939 edits Delete – the article seems promotional ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:13, 10 November 2016 edit undo Coast123 (talk \| contribs) 257 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* '''Delete''': The article seems to exist only for promotional purposes. I don't see any indication of significant coverage in high-quality independent reliable sources. —[[User:BarrelProof\|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof\|talk]]) 18:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)		* '''Delete''': The article seems to exist only for promotional purposes. I don't see any indication of significant coverage in high-quality independent reliable sources. —[[User:BarrelProof\|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof\|talk]]) 18:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

			Thank you for the feedback but I can assure you as the creator the intention of this piece isn't promotional, but to provide details on the long history of the business using [[Gizmodo]] as base structure to create the page. I will look to add a section on coverage with details on breaking news & additional notable sources. Will post here as soon as this has been updated, any further advice & guidance is greatly appreciated. —[[User:Coast123\|Coast123]] ([[User talk:Coast123\|talk]]) 9:30, 10 November 2016 (GMT)