Jump to content

User talk:Shorwak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
HostBot (talk | contribs)
Shorwak (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 22:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#800000">'''Mlpearc'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Mlpearc|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''open channel'''</span>]])</small></span> 22:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

It has already been redirected so deletion is not right. [[User:Shorwak|Shorwak]] ([[User talk:Shorwak#top|talk]]) 03:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


I suggest you get cracking and write more on that article. On the other hand, it could be wasted effort. Good luck. [[User:Samswik|Samswik]] ([[User talk:Samswik|talk]]) 00:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
I suggest you get cracking and write more on that article. On the other hand, it could be wasted effort. Good luck. [[User:Samswik|Samswik]] ([[User talk:Samswik|talk]]) 00:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:46, 29 November 2016

November 2016

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Malia Obama (First Daughter) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 22:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate thing to do would be to convert the existing redirect, since there are no other notable Malia Obamas. While I think that there will be scope for an article soon, I don't see anything in your fork that isn't or can't be mentioned in the existing topic for the time being. And please stop attributing actions to political motives. Acroterion (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malia Obama (First Daughter)

The article Malia Obama (First Daughter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I agree with C.Fred, at this time her only significance is she's the President's daughter.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been redirected so deletion is not right. Shorwak (talk) 03:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you get cracking and write more on that article. On the other hand, it could be wasted effort. Good luck. Samswik (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shorwak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Shorwak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)