Jump to content

User talk:Samswik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Samswik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Samswik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

[[Category:Wikipe

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Samswik. You have new messages at Bojo1498's talk page.
Message added 16:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

bojo1498 talk 16:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm Eric-Wester. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Naked Cowboy, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eric-Wester (talk) 03:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump article

[edit]

Hello, Samswik! Thanks for wanting to improve the article Donald Trump, but please don't go adding things (particularly without any references) like the quote about Mexico and the Taiwan phone call. The Mexico quote, randomly thrown in with a section of its own, was entirely out of place. The Taiwan phone call was in the right place but unsourced, and there has been controversy at the talk page about whether to add anything about it. Please be cautious about that article, it is heavily watched, and special restrictions apply to it which can be read at the top of any edit page. (For example, only one revert allowed per 24 hours, and if something of yours gets removed, do not add it again.) It is always best, before adding something, to check and see if it is controversial (there is usually a reason why it isn't already there). If you have questions or comments, you can ask me here; I will see it. --MelanieN (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.

- MrX 18:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC) - MrX 18:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]