Jump to content

Talk:ARA News: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ian.thomson (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Wikisiki999 (talk) to last version by Batternut
Undid revision 766442800 by Ian.thomson (talk)
Line 10: Line 10:
This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. [[User:Constellation2023|Constellation2023]] ([[User talk:Constellation2023|talk]]) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. [[User:Constellation2023|Constellation2023]] ([[User talk:Constellation2023|talk]]) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:Welcome ''Constellation2023'' to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]? [[User:Batternut|Batternut]] ([[User talk:Batternut|talk]]) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
:Welcome ''Constellation2023'' to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]? [[User:Batternut|Batternut]] ([[User talk:Batternut|talk]]) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

== Advertisement ==

Some sections are written like an advertisement. Might want to remove the advertisement sounding sentences like "it has been referenced a thousand times" and other problematic language. Thank you. [[User:Wikisiki999|Wikisiki999]] ([[User talk:Wikisiki999|talk]]) 05:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:06, 20 February 2017

Biased news

This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. Constellation2023 (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Constellation2023 to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on verifiability? Batternut (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some sections are written like an advertisement. Might want to remove the advertisement sounding sentences like "it has been referenced a thousand times" and other problematic language. Thank you. Wikisiki999 (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]