Talk:ARA News: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Wikisiki999 (talk) to last version by Batternut |
Undid revision 766442800 by Ian.thomson (talk) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. [[User:Constellation2023|Constellation2023]] ([[User talk:Constellation2023|talk]]) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. [[User:Constellation2023|Constellation2023]] ([[User talk:Constellation2023|talk]]) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
:Welcome ''Constellation2023'' to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]? [[User:Batternut|Batternut]] ([[User talk:Batternut|talk]]) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
:Welcome ''Constellation2023'' to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]? [[User:Batternut|Batternut]] ([[User talk:Batternut|talk]]) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Advertisement == |
|||
Some sections are written like an advertisement. Might want to remove the advertisement sounding sentences like "it has been referenced a thousand times" and other problematic language. Thank you. [[User:Wikisiki999|Wikisiki999]] ([[User talk:Wikisiki999|talk]]) 05:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:06, 20 February 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ARA News article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Biased news
This news service is obviously biased. Therefore, it is not a reliable source of information and cannot be used as a reference. Constellation2023 (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Welcome Constellation2023 to your first day editing Wikipedia! Perhaps you would like to cite some evidence for your view? I see that all of your 5 edits to articles have already been reverted for one reason or another, can I suggest you read the Wikipedia policy on verifiability? Batternut (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Advertisement
Some sections are written like an advertisement. Might want to remove the advertisement sounding sentences like "it has been referenced a thousand times" and other problematic language. Thank you. Wikisiki999 (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Unassessed Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Unassessed Media articles
- Unknown-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Unassessed Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Unassessed Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles