Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palo y hueso: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:35, 24 February 2017

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Access Denied – talk to me 06:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Palo y hueso

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Includes no assertion of notability. Because it's listed in IMDB it probably fails A7, so I'm nominating here. Access Denied – talk to me 10:47, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. The best thing possibly would have been to redirect to List of Argentine films of 1968. Note though there are quite a lot of short Argentine film stubs. Most of them originally began as redirects tothe lists but I started adding a little to them to fill them out. Unfortunately the task was too big for me and I gave up. Ideally the lists need filling out completely first and then those films which cannot be expanded should be redirected, though I would say that most of the articles could be expanded.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:46, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the sources and great additions by Aymatth2.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a notable movie by an acclaimed Argentinian director. I have added some content with sources. Much more is available. I recommend that the nominator withdraw the nomination to avoid wasting any more editors' time. To be fair, the version nominated was a trivial stub. But this is a very well-known movie. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per improvements since nomination that show that notability... and notability in Argentina is perfectly fine with en.Wikipedia. And yes, the nom should consider a withdrawal since others were able to improve what he could not. Big kudos to Aymatth2 for his diligent efforts. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-The result was    ''''''. '''Nomination withdrawn''' ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) <small class="ad-sig" style="background:#880000;border:1px solid black;color:white;">'''[[User:Access Denied|<font color="white">Access Denied</font>]] &ndash; [[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="white">talk to me</font>]]'''</small> 06:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
+The result was '''Nomination withdrawn''' ([[Wikipedia:non-admin closure|non-admin closure]]) <small class="ad-sig" style="background:#880000;border:1px solid black;color:white;">'''[[User:Access Denied|<font color="white">Access Denied</font>]] &ndash; [[User talk:Access Denied|<font color="white">talk to me</font>]]'''</small> 06:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 ===[[Palo y hueso]]===