Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Berggruen Prize

The Berggruen Prize

The Berggruen Prize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate page with more information Tomcohen05 (talk) 21:00, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

• Duplicate of what? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 21:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep, tentatively: I see that this article was created 12 May 2016 (see this early version with substantially the same material as had already appeared in the "Berggruen Philosophy Prize" section of the Berggruen Institute article. There is duplication, yes, e.g. listing all members of the awards committee, which should not be in two places. It may be reasonable for the material to be split out of the Institute article, and then its section should now be edited down. --doncram 02:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
• Weak keep - assuming this is an annual prize (as it is intended to be), it is useful to have a page independent of the institution. If the prize was discontinued, it might makes sense to merge it back into the institute. But the institute's page is long enough that this seems like a nice thing to spin out, as it seems to me to satisfy WP:N. Smmurphy^(Talk) 02:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep, It seems to me that the Berggruen Prize has generated sufficient publicity and is notable enough to warrant its own page, and will certainly continue to each year it is warded. Tmnh07 (talk) 02:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep, This was a mistake deletion. I meant to delete the duplicate (but less robust) page Berggruen Prize. Tomcohen05 (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
  • For uncontentious matters, which I think is, you can merge the two articles together by following the merge instructions (Wikipedia:Merging) which are linked in the top of the Berggruen Prize article. Given that the notice intimating the merge has been on that article for several months, with no-one objecting, I doubt doing so now will prove to be an issue. An ordinary merge like this doesn't need a deletion discussion. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 20:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

• Keep, Thanks! I merged the two articles following the procedure on the link you shared.Tomcohen05 (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomcohen05 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)