Jump to content

User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Deleted Image?: new section
Line 81: Line 81:
Hi Fred,
Hi Fred,


You have deleted my updated image on Ashley Massaro's Wikipedia page for copyright violation. However, I have the request of Ashley Massaro for the change as well as the approval of the photographer as well. I can include proof if needed.
You have deleted my updated image on Ashley Massaro's Wikipedia page for copyright violation. However, I have the request of Ashley Massaro for the change as well as the approval of the photographer as well. I can include proof if needed. Also, the image alone is used for the biography of Ashley Massaro and is acceptable under the 'Editorial use' and is NOT used to raise money, sell something, advertise, or promote in which would require a 'Commercial Use' approval.


I also had posted this concern on another 'Talk' page of yours as well.
I also had posted this concern on another 'Talk' page of yours as well.

Revision as of 22:58, 13 June 2017


Crown 2017

Thanx for protecting the Carolina Crown Drum and Bugle Corps article... However, your TBA for the theme is out of place, since the the corps has officially announced that the theme is It Is... Yes, they did include the word "Eclectic" on the graphics of their announcement, but the accompanying text stated only It Is... Questions on the corps' Facebook page elicited the response that the title is simply, It Is... There has been much speculation as to whether or not there will be a "Part 2" to the announcement or if "Eclectic" or other terms might be added at some future date, but the announced theme at this time is simply, It Is... GWFrog (talk) 03:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@GWFrog: Reading some of the later comments, while I'm leaning toward "It Is" being the theme, I'm not convinced that we're sure, per Wikipedia's rules, that it's the theme. Also, the more something is challenged or changed, the stronger the sources required to make the statement. —C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The corps has now been heard from... According to the Carolina Crown staff, as if now, the name/theme of the program is "It Is", but more will be added next week... GWFrog (talk) 03:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@GWFrog: Have you got a link to where that was published? To clarify, where they have specifically said the theme is "It Is" and not left room for speculation? —C.Fred (talk) 03:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cmoment from the Carolina Crown staff on their Facebook page, "This was only part of the announcement. More to come÷ next week. Until then, happy theorizing."...GWFrog (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@GWFrog: There was no unambiguous announcement there, and the "happy theorizing" didn't help the situation any. That's the same announcement and comment I saw that had me hedge on the name. —C.Fred (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Part 2 is now out... The same "it is" is now accompanied by "DYNAMIC" The theme is, as stated, simply "it is"... Anything else is just a descriptive adjective... GWFrog (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Olympics Medal Table Discussion

Thank you for your earlier message. Per your recommendation, I have begun a discussion on the 2014 Winter Olympics medal table talk page, located here. Thank you again for your help in this matter. — SpintendoTalk 00:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regular show vandal

Thank you for blocking Special:Contributions/179.60.111.17 earlier. That user is a long term abuse case (User:EvergreenFir/socks#Regular). Just wanted to let you know and to say thanks. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to update page

Fred, I have been trying to update a wiki page and my alterations keep getting reverted. Please explain to me how to make the changes stick.

Thank you Sonny9999Sonny9999 (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Sonny is currently blocked. See discussion on their talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested input

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily Deletion

Hi I just wanted to say that I am not being paid to make "changes" to the Roven Records page that was recently deleted. I am an unpaid intern, and I was creating this wikipedia page for the record label I am interning at. KhalilRodgers (talk)

@KhalilRodgers: As an unpaid intern you still have a conflict of interest, even if you don't fall under the paid-editor guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 18:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit

Why did you revert my edits on Kylo Ren? I corrected some facts based off of what my friend, who really knows star wars, told me

@DWindsor49: Edits need to be based on reliable sources, not what your friend says, especially if your friend says a character is a turnip. —C.Fred (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

I contested the speedy deletion tag that was put on a page I created about a band called Truth and Rites, and then edited the entry to further explain the band's significance. Why was it then deleted? FiremanIntern (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FiremanIntern: Because nothing on the page indicated that the band was significant. —C.Fred (talk) 20:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page talked about other famous artists who the band has been featured on albums and played concerts with. Does that not count as significance? FiremanIntern (talk) 20:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FiremanIntern: No, although the festival is close. See WP:NBAND for a list of things that do count. Also, remember that there need to be independent reliable sources to back up the claims. At the time of deletion, the article had no independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Image?

Hi Fred,

You have deleted my updated image on Ashley Massaro's Wikipedia page for copyright violation. However, I have the request of Ashley Massaro for the change as well as the approval of the photographer as well. I can include proof if needed. Also, the image alone is used for the biography of Ashley Massaro and is acceptable under the 'Editorial use' and is NOT used to raise money, sell something, advertise, or promote in which would require a 'Commercial Use' approval.

I also had posted this concern on another 'Talk' page of yours as well.

Nat Pipitone (talk) 22:39, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]