Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geordie Haka: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Speedy delete'''. Trivial subject created by banned user who is clearly not here to edit constructively. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 05:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. Trivial subject created by banned user who is clearly not here to edit constructively. [[User:DerbyCountyinNZ|<span style="background:orange; color:blue">DerbyCountyinNZ</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:DerbyCountyinNZ|Talk]] [[Special:Contribs/DerbyCountyinNZ|Contribs]])</sup> 05:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
**I support '''Speedy delete''' also. I nominated the article for deletion about 20 minutes before the creator, [[User:Dinglebat500]], was indefinitely blocked, or I might have went straight for CSD. - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 06:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
**I support '''Speedy delete''' also. I nominated the article for deletion about 20 minutes before the creator, [[User:Dinglebat500]], was indefinitely blocked, or I might have went straight for CSD. - [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 06:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
***'''Keep:''' This is an article that should definetly be kept as it is famous locally and it should be kept. There are hundreds of articles on Wikipedia which are famous only locally, and they're not deleted. Thanks, [[User:ClueBot XV|ClueBot XV]] ([[User talk:ClueBot XV|talk]]) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
'''Note: I'm a legit bot and I don't try to violate the username policy ''' [[User:ClueBot XV|ClueBot XV]] ([[User talk:ClueBot XV|talk]]) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:55, 21 June 2017

Geordie Haka

Geordie Haka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article gives no evidence of notability beyond local significance BilCat (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. Trivial subject created by banned user who is clearly not here to edit constructively. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I support Speedy delete also. I nominated the article for deletion about 20 minutes before the creator, User:Dinglebat500, was indefinitely blocked, or I might have went straight for CSD. - BilCat (talk) 06:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep: This is an article that should definetly be kept as it is famous locally and it should be kept. There are hundreds of articles on Wikipedia which are famous only locally, and they're not deleted. Thanks, ClueBot XV (talk) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm a legit bot and I don't try to violate the username policy ClueBot XV (talk) 06:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]