Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists

Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists

Indian Association of Clinical Cardiologists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed by creator. Original prod was to allow for adding of in-depth sources which I was unable to locate in searches of Google search, Google News, and books. Everything I did find was simply a passing mention. Fails WP:ORG and WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Should not be deleted

Hi all, I feel this article should exist in Wikipedia. Because, 1. The subject is covered by newspapers, news websites like The Hindu,The Times of India, etc and those are not at all press release. 2. This organisation is 'NOT' profitable, commercial establishment. It is 'Non-profitable' service organisation and it is not looking for any kind of 'advertisement and promotion' to wide the business. 3. The vision of this organisation is 'To eradicate heart decease from India', So Wikipedia may disseminate this to whole world. 4. This organisation is not just headed by some X,Y and Z doctors but the leaders are eminent professional in the medical field and for their service to society, the Indian government has honored those people by Indian highest civilian awards like 'Padma Shri', Padma Bhushan and this I mention to stress how important this organisation is. Others please think on this and share your views. Thank you.Uyarafath (talk) 03:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete-1)Not for profit does not mean the company does not advertise.(Even the Wikimedia Foundation advertises).2)Vision is not a criterion for notability(Even organisations with one member can have visions of changing the world .It is the work and its coverage that counts).3)The "leaders" are not at all leaders but patrons of the organizations who may or may not be linked with the organization itself[no sorce affirming that has been provided]4)Most of the sources provided are of passing mentions of the organization[hindu and TOI] (Do not constitute notability).Some are press releases .Some of them are coverage regarding the so called patrons110.227.103.178 (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

• Don't Delete - Reply to above comments: Hi, 1) Please understand what is 'advertisement'. Whenever a 'Non-profit' organisation advertises, it is not for commercial gain or profit. It means the foundation to be known to serve better. 2) This is where we, the human has to look into whether is an organisation simply one man organisation or it is a collaborative effort by many people. And this particular organisation's vision has been created forwarded by eminent doctors who are all the recipients of India's highest civilian awards. 3) The subject is not just passing mentions in the leading news papers. The news paper covered the subject particularly. References for conference proceedings will be this much only but it clearly support the subject I hope. So others if you feel it is worth this subject to be in Wikipedia kindly give your opinion.Uyarafath (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)