Jump to content

Talk:Bhagavata Sampradaya: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1)
Line 15: Line 15:
''Narayana'' the seer who composed [[Purusha Sukta]](10th mandala of [[Rigveda]]),was later deified as the supreme God,how is that non vedic?(the flowchart says so)
''Narayana'' the seer who composed [[Purusha Sukta]](10th mandala of [[Rigveda]]),was later deified as the supreme God,how is that non vedic?(the flowchart says so)
[[User:Nijgoykar|Nijgoykar]] ([[User talk:Nijgoykar|talk]]) 02:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
[[User:Nijgoykar|Nijgoykar]] ([[User talk:Nijgoykar|talk]]) 02:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
:This is really nuts.[[Special:Contributions/49.207.61.24|49.207.61.24]] ([[User talk:49.207.61.24|talk]]) 10:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 10:44, 13 September 2017

WikiProject iconHinduism: Krishnaism C‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconReligion C‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disambiguation

It has been suggested that the page become a disambiguation page for Bhagavata, which can refer to either of two different religious traditions from two different time periods, as well as an abbreviated name of the Bhagavata Purana. This proposal can be discussed here. --Shruti14 t c s 18:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support the proposal. --Shruti14 t c s 18:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support proposal for disambiguation. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal clarification I would appreciate if you can outline which two different religious traditions you mean. As I can see the need of the disambiguation but some conclude that 4 c. BC Bhagavata and current Bhagavata sampradaya are the same tradition, and others are branches of that tradition, we need to have one article for all bhagavata traditions? I propose to have 3 main entries in disambiguation
  1. Bhagavata religious traditions that include anscient Bhagavatism as a section, as well as other traditions that belong to this line,
  2. Bhagavata as the name of purana, with the associated meanings of the term.
  3. Bhagavata as a devotee of Bhagavata Purana or Bhagavata(within one of the traditons belonging to Bhagavata No1.)Wikidās ॐ 16:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Narayana worship is non vedic?

Narayana the seer who composed Purusha Sukta(10th mandala of Rigveda),was later deified as the supreme God,how is that non vedic?(the flowchart says so) Nijgoykar (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is really nuts.49.207.61.24 (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhagavata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]