Jump to content

User talk:AlexVegaEsquire: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎ANI discussion: new section
Line 63: Line 63:


== ANI discussion ==
== ANI discussion ==


I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations.

What's the rationale for not including in lead?



[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:53, 22 September 2017

Kevin Deutsch

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Deutsch (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AlexVegaEsquire, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi AlexVegaEsquire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Deutsch has been accepted

Kevin Deutsch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring and discuss your reversions

I have started a section at Talk:Kevin_Deutsch#Dispute for you and the other user to discuss your disagreements, since apparently neither one of you know how to do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Deutsch Revision as of 23:32, 18 September 2017

You reverted my edit to Kevin Deutsch with the comment, Undid edit because it ciolates Wiki's living person's policies. Deutsch has written thousands of articles and a fraction of them have been qstnd. Revision contains other inaccuracies. However, my edit, on which I commented Typo, merely changed the words "this mother's name" to "his mother's name". Please take more care when making revisions. -- Pemilligan (talk) 13:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations.

What's the rationale for not including in lead?


Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SnowFire (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]