User talk:AlexVegaEsquire: Difference between revisions
→ANI discussion: new section |
|||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
== ANI discussion == |
== ANI discussion == |
||
I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations. |
|||
What's the rationale for not including in lead? |
|||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:53, 22 September 2017
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Deutsch (November 11)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin Deutsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AlexVegaEsquire, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi AlexVegaEsquire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Deutsch has been accepted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Stop edit warring and discuss your reversions
I have started a section at Talk:Kevin_Deutsch#Dispute for you and the other user to discuss your disagreements, since apparently neither one of you know how to do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Kevin Deutsch Revision as of 23:32, 18 September 2017
You reverted my edit to Kevin Deutsch with the comment, Undid edit because it ciolates Wiki's living person's policies. Deutsch has written thousands of articles and a fraction of them have been qstnd. Revision contains other inaccuracies. However, my edit, on which I commented Typo, merely changed the words "this mother's name" to "his mother's name". Please take more care when making revisions. -- Pemilligan (talk) 13:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
ANI discussion
I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations.
What's the rationale for not including in lead?
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. SnowFire (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)