Talk:List of recipients of the Star of Courage: Difference between revisions
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.3.2.2) |
→Large "quotes": new section |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Large "quotes" == |
|||
As a general question, how much can we 'quote' from a site before it becomes plagiarism? Generally, in an academic work, or in something wishing to be that rigorous, shouldn't we paraphrase large sections of other people's work rather than pulling hundreds of words verbatim? |
|||
Where the quoted work is poorly worded or suffers from poor grammar, should we not re-phrase? |
|||
Aren't we trying to create something of which the world can be proud? |
Revision as of 22:30, 10 October 2017
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of recipients of the Star of Courage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160612070942/http://www.gg.gov.au/australian-honours-and-awards/australian-honours-lists to http://www.gg.gov.au/australian-honours-and-awards/australian-honours-lists
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Large "quotes"
As a general question, how much can we 'quote' from a site before it becomes plagiarism? Generally, in an academic work, or in something wishing to be that rigorous, shouldn't we paraphrase large sections of other people's work rather than pulling hundreds of words verbatim?
Where the quoted work is poorly worded or suffers from poor grammar, should we not re-phrase?
Aren't we trying to create something of which the world can be proud?
- Unassessed Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- Unknown-importance Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals articles
- List-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- List-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles