Jump to content

Talk:Communes of Luxembourg: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 128: Line 128:
* '''Opppose''' Per [[WP:UE]] and official name. Note that French is only one of the languages frequently used in Luxembourg. [[Special:Contributions/85.178.112.88|85.178.112.88]] ([[User talk:85.178.112.88|talk]]) 15:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
* '''Opppose''' Per [[WP:UE]] and official name. Note that French is only one of the languages frequently used in Luxembourg. [[Special:Contributions/85.178.112.88|85.178.112.88]] ([[User talk:85.178.112.88|talk]]) 15:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I have moved the page back to the previous version, at which it was stable for 12 years. {{user|ALLofME}} should not have used [[WP:RMTR]] which is for "Uncontroversial technical requests" and instead commenced their own RM. The activity from certain IPs and new users is highly suspicious and suggests experienced trolls. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 17:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I have moved the page back to the previous version, at which it was stable for 12 years. {{user|ALLofME}} should not have used [[WP:RMTR]] which is for "Uncontroversial technical requests" and instead commenced their own RM. The activity from certain IPs and new users is highly suspicious and suggests experienced trolls. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 17:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
** [[User:AusLondonder]] - You violated with moving the page during an on-going discussion. The move be ALLofME was not contested for several month. You ridicule WP policies and guidelines. [[WP:UE]], [[WP:BOLD]], [[WP:FIXIT]]. [[Special:Contributions/77.179.110.153|77.179.110.153]] ([[User talk:77.179.110.153|talk]]) 04:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:10, 31 October 2017

WikiProject iconLuxembourg B‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

106 Communes as of 2012

List
  • Beaufort - Grevenmacher District
  • Bech - Grevenmacher District
  • Beckerich - Diekirch District
  • Berdorf - Grevenmacher District
  • Bertrange - Luxembourg District
  • Bettembourg - Luxembourg District
  • Bettendorf - Diekirch District
  • Betzdorf - Grevenmacher District
  • Bissen - Luxembourg District
  • Biwer - Grevenmacher District
  • Boevange-sur-Attert - Luxembourg District
  • Boulaide - Diekirch District
  • Bourscheid - Diekirch District
  • Bous - Grevenmacher District
  • Clervaux - Diekirch District
  • Colmar-Berg - Luxembourg District
  • Consdorf - Grevenmacher District
  • Contern - Luxembourg District
  • Dalheim - Grevenmacher District
  • Diekirch - Diekirch District
  • Differdange - Luxembourg District
  • Dippach - Luxembourg District
  • Dudelange - Luxembourg District
  • Echternach - Grevenmacher District
  • Ell - Diekirch District
  • Erpeldange - Diekirch District
  • Esch-sur-Alzette - Luxembourg District
  • Esch-sur-Sûre - Diekirch District
  • Eschweiler - Diekirch District
  • Ettelbruck - Diekirch District
  • Feulen - Diekirch District
  • Fischbach - Luxembourg District
  • Flaxweiler - Grevenmacher District
  • Frisange - Luxembourg District
  • Garnich - Luxembourg District
  • Goesdorf - Diekirch District
  • Grevenmacher - Grevenmacher District
  • Grosbous - Diekirch District
  • Heffingen - Luxembourg District
  • Hesperange - Luxembourg District
  • Hobscheid - Luxembourg District
  • Junglinster - Grevenmacher District
  • Käerjeng - Luxembourg District
  • Kayl - Luxembourg District
  • Kehlen - Luxembourg District
  • Kiischpelt - Diekirch District
  • Koerich - Luxembourg District
  • Kopstal - Luxembourg District
  • Lac de la Haute-Sûre - Diekirch District
  • Larochette - Luxembourg District
  • Lenningen - Grevenmacher District
  • Leudelange - Luxembourg District
  • Lintgen - Luxembourg District
  • Lorentzweiler - Luxembourg District
  • Luxembourg - Luxembourg District (NOT A TRUE COMMUNE NOW, CITY STATUS ONLY)
  • Mamer - Luxembourg District
  • Manternach - Grevenmacher District
  • Mersch - Luxembourg District
  • Mertert - Grevenmacher District
  • Mertzig - Diekirch District
  • Mompach - Grevenmacher District
  • Mondercange - Luxembourg District
  • Mondorf-les-Bains - Grevenmacher District
  • Niederanven - Luxembourg District
  • Nommern - Luxembourg District
  • Parc Hosingen - Diekirch District
  • Pétange - Luxembourg District
  • Préizerdaul - Diekirch District
  • Putscheid - Diekirch District
  • Rambrouch - Diekirch District
  • Reckange-sur-Mess - Luxembourg District
  • Redange - Diekirch District
  • Reisdorf - Diekirch District
  • Remerschen - Grevenmacher District
  • Remich - Grevenmacher District
  • Roeser - Luxembourg District
  • Rosport - Grevenmacher District
  • Rumelange - Luxembourg District
  • Saeul - Diekirch District
  • Sandweiler - Luxembourg District
  • Sanem - Luxembourg District
  • Schengen - Grevenmacher District
  • Schieren - Diekirch District
  • Schifflange - Luxembourg District
  • Schuttrange - Luxembourg District
  • Septfontaines - Luxembourg District
  • Stadtbredimus - Grevenmacher District
  • Steinfort - Luxembourg District
  • Steinsel - Luxembourg District
  • Strassen - Luxembourg District
  • Tandel - Diekirch District
  • Troisvierges - Diekirch District
  • Tuntange - Luxembourg District
  • Useldange - Diekirch District
  • Vallée de l'Ernz - Diekirch District
  • Vianden - Diekirch District
  • Vichten - Diekirch District
  • Wahl - Diekirch District
  • Waldbillig - Grevenmacher District
  • Waldbredimus - Grevenmacher District
  • Walferdange - Luxembourg District
  • Weiler-la-Tour - Luxembourg District
  • Weiswampach - Diekirch District
  • Wiltz - Diekirch District
  • Wincrange - Diekirch District
  • Winseler - Diekirch District
  • Wormeldange - Grevenmacher District — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.32.193.130 (talk) 09:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 October 2017

Municipalities of LuxembourgCommunes of Luxembourg – The text of this page was changed from "communes" to "municipalities" by a WP:SPA, ALLofME (talk · contribs). [1] That same user also nominated the page at WP:RM/TR for moving to Municipalities of Luxembourg with the justification:

"Communes" is French, the official English term as used by the Luxembourg government is municipality: http://www.statistiques.public.lu/stat/TableViewer/document.aspx?ReportId=12704&IF_Language=eng&MainTheme=1&FldrName=1

Now an IP account 77.179.86.68 has listed the category for renaming. The IP range points to the identify of the nominator as user:Tobias Conradi who is blocked on Wikipedia.

Evidence? 85.178.112.88 (talk) 15:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no axe to grind either way, but the move needs to be reviewed by a full RM discussion. – Fayenatic London 08:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Fayenatic london - if you find nothing that was wrong with the move to "Municipalities of Luxembourg" carried out by User:Station1, then it is disruptive to propose to move it to "Communes of Luxembourg". 85.178.112.88 (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence of WP:SOCK: (i) Two other 77.179... IP addresses from Telefonica Germany were included in the last batch of socks blocked at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tobias_Conradi/Archive#27_October_2017. (ii) Pattern of editing: the first and only edits from this address dived straight in with nominations using somewhat arcane Wikipedia procedures.
As I attempted to make clear above, I am not actually seeking a move back to the old name, but ensuring that a full discussion is held on the name, rather than allowing technical procedures to be used for one renaming after another without full examination of the merits of the case. – Fayenatic London 16:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]