User talk:John3825: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:33, 13 November 2017

Welcome! John3825 (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Hello, John3825, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:[reply]

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 16:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Where is it on their website?[1] This article[2] in the Japan Times says the winning candidate may be announced next year. There has been no official announcement, your source only mentions an interview. You really do have to stop and get agreement on the appropriate talk pages or you will be blocked from editing. We can't have badly sourced material added as fact. Doug Weller talk 17:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John3825 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The talk and the discussion are worthless without a single fact and the moderator, Drmies, is warned many times for unreasonable blocks from many other users stated in the talk page of the moderator.

Decline reason:

Evidently, you failed to read the guide to appealing blocks, specifically WP:NOTTHEM. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

* Favonian  Please read the history of the talk or change comment with the fact that they are reverting with vandalism without a single fact of reality to the official decision fro the organization.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 You really do have to stop and get agreement on the appropriate talk pages or you will be blocked from editing. We can't have badly sourced material added as fact. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 17:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
-{{unblock reviewed|reason=The talk and the discussion are worthless without a single fact and the moderator, [[User talk:Drmies|Drmies]], is warned many times for unreasonable blocks from many other users stated in the talk page of the moderator.|decline=Evidently, you failed to read the guide to appealing blocks, specifically [[WP:NOTTHEM]]. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 18:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC). [[User:Favonian|Favonian]]  Please read the history of the talk or change commemt with the fact that they are reverting with vandalism without any single fact to the official decision fro the organization. }}
+{{unblock reviewed|reason=The talk and the discussion are worthless without a single fact and the moderator, [[User talk:Drmies|Drmies]], is warned many times for unreasonable blocks from many other users stated in the talk page of the moderator.|decline=Evidently, you failed to read the guide to appealing blocks, specifically [[WP:NOTTHEM]]. [[User:Favonian|Favonian]] ([[User talk:Favonian|talk]]) 18:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC).
+ * [[User:Favonian|Favonian]]  Please read the history of the talk or change comment with the fact that they are reverting with vandalism without a single fact of reality to the official decision fro the organization. }}