User talk:My Lord

Culture and music of Kashmir

Thank you for your note. As part of maintaining a neutral point of view, we treat each country's controlled zone as belonging to it: our Jammu and Kashmir article covers just the Indian side of the Line of Control, and our Azad Kashmir article just the Pakistani side. For that reason, these moves wouldn't be a good idea — they cover the entire region, both the Indian-controlled areas and the Pakistani-controlled areas. The effect of renaming would be to restrict each article's scope to one side or the other (in which case we ought to have two articles, versus having one right now) or to privilege one side over the other, and I don't suppose you'd prefer to see an article entitled "Culture of Azad Kashmir" that covers Srinagar, for example. Nyttend (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Seeing that Urdu is a scheduled language of the Union, and seeing that it's used a good deal in Kashmir, please do not remove it. Nyttend (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

@Nyttend: Sanskrit is also a schedule language of India. Then for sake of NPOV we should add Sanskrit too. Anmolbhat (talk) 05:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

The difference being that it is not used extensively in Kashmir. Nyttend (talk) 06:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

@Nyttend: But things like music , art , culture are from Hindus which have history of over 5000 years in Kashmir and still is. So mentioning of Sanskrit name is also important.Anmolbhat (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

If I'm wrong in saying it is not used extensively there, feel free to add it. An article should have the English name of its subject, plus the subject's name in any other language that's highly important to the subject. Nyttend (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

• FYI, I removed it because it goes against our indic script policy. --regentspark (comment) 13:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!!! Anmolbhat (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Can you please stop adding bias to the carreer section of KSHMRs page.

Please stop this vandalism Amy wamey (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

@Amy wamey: Hey!! . I wanted to know that there is a difference between co producer and Ghost Producer. Niles ghost produced for those Producers that's why co production is not the right term. Anmolbhat (talk) 08:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kshmr. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Considering I explicitly stated why this wasn't vandalism and was in fact the correct wording to use based on the sources, I'm not sure why you continue to push this edit and make bad faith accusations towards another editor. Additionally, I have a suspicion that you are using multiple accounts and editing while logged out. This can lead to being blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts.