User talk:KINGPORUS

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arjuna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arjuna was changed by KINGPORUS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893033 on 2017-12-06T21:50:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arjuna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arjuna was changed by KINGPORUS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850947 on 2017-12-16T16:17:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhargavastra

Hello KINGPORUS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bhargavastra for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Template:Z166

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Dec, 2017

You are edit WP:WARing on Karna. Your edit lacks citations and are disruptive. If you want to contribute, please build consensus on talk page before doing contentious edits. You have been warned. Crawford88 (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

You have violated WP:3RR rule and are reported for the same.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Crawford88 (talk) 05:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Karna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:KINGPORUS reported by User:The Mighty Glen (Result: ). Thank you. The Mighty Glen (talk) 19:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Karna. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  regentspark (comment) 19:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Karna. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Astra (weapon), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  regentspark (comment) 20:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• Additional note. Please familiarize yourself with the use of talk pages or you're going to end up indef blocked. --regentspark (comment) 21:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

KINGPORUS (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

---

Block ID: #8178192 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: RegentsPark (talk • blocks)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "KINGPORUS". The reason given for KINGPORUS's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KINGPO...

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=KINGPORUS}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=RegentsPark | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "KINGPORUS". The reason given for KINGPORUS's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KINGPO...</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=8178192 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "KINGPORUS". The reason given for KINGPORUS's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KINGPO...</nowiki> | 3=RegentsPark | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "KINGPORUS". The reason given for KINGPORUS's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KINGPO...</nowiki> | 3=RegentsPark | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}