User talk:Fiftytoone

Fair use rationale for File:2009_AMGA_Income_Chart.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2009_AMGA_Income_Chart.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Name change

Hello Fiftytoone,

See Wikipedia:Article titles. Neutrality^talk 19:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Nurse anesthetist

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.oana.org/about-us or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Alleged Copyright violation

I don’t believe this is a copyright violation. The information I used comes directly from MY national association’s advocacy page. These documents were designed by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. The association allows its members, which I am one, to use these advocacy documents however we choose without concern of copyright violations. Bottom line, using the content of these publications is exactly what they were designed for. They are even referenced. Will you kindly restore the additions made to these pages? Fiftytoone (talk) 11:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Nurse Anesthetists page

Also, why did you remove the “also known as nurse anesthesiologist?” These changes were made by board certified CRNAs and members of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Who better to authenticate legitimacy of the information?

Fiftytoone (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Furthermore....

The information on the OANA webpage, which is a state association affiliated with the national association, is the identical document produced by the AANA; a document that the AANA not only authorizes but encourages it’s members to use. We have full rights and discretion to use this information. Fiftytoone (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)