User talk:77.100.234.159

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Comfort women into Wartime sexual violence. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sexual slavery, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sexual slavery. Misleading edit summaries, blanking of materials, likely socking EvergreenFir (talk) 22:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proto-Mongoloid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Read the sources and read the sentence, it says, "The term, Proto-Mongoloid, was used to refer to all or part of the populations of..." Do not remove information with sources, your POV edits don't help at all. You also changed the wording of some sentences and removed letters from certain words to the point that they did not make sense. E.g. "Proto-Mongoloid is not still adapted to cold climate in Siberia" does not make grammatical sense, so refrain from making such edits. (121.214.36.82 (talk) 22:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC))

You are obviously not a moderator or someone who has the right to a send anyone a warning message, just for making imitations warning alone I could report you for it. I don't know why you seem to have a desire to seem revert my every edit and read you weird messages.

You said find a source ? There's no source to support early Japanese/Koreans have South Asian genetic input that's why I removed it, if it did has source you or someone would have have cited it. I couldn't find any data other than misleading forums that claims that has but have no paper study, no links to support this so I removed it.

About proto-Mongoloid. Madagascar is a country that's clearly Sub-Saharan African, Polynesians are mixed, Ainu look nothing like people from southern China, southeast Asia. The whole source from a random outdated book source.

Also about Philippines, there's not a single need to write about historical violence against Filipino women. Every country in Europe, Africa, Asia, America's of every ethnicity had suffered sexual crimes by insiders or outsiders. For examples countries like India, Iran, Ukraine, China, Iraq , Germany would be a very long story to write about their own countries sexual violence, same for every ethnicity in the world. It's really a need for such cruelty, anyone can start writing horrible history on every female group. (121.214.36.82 (talk)) 18:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC))

Instead of fighting, accept that fact that you made mistakes and learn from them. Your spiel about "proto-Mongoloid" makes no sense. You clearly know nothing about Madagascan people, so what if Ainus don't look like Southern Chinese? If you knew anything about the things that you edit you would know that "proto-Mongoloid" is an obsolete term, it has no scientific meaning today. Secondly, "bias" edits on Chinese Americans. What is biased about it? Read the sources IP. It's clear to see that you are biased in the way you edit Wikipedia, elevating pages on Chinese or Southeast Asian articles but degrading those that are related to India or Indian people. Stop this POV nonsense. Don't you dare tell me that I'm doing the wrong thing when you're screaming in the comment sections at other users aiming to forward your racist agenda. (121.214.36.82 (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Violence against women in the Philippines, you may be blocked from editing. (121.214.36.82 (talk) 05:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC))