User talk:Sagaciousphil

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Frank Matcham --RexxS (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

• ​I assume you will also be issuing an alert to Gerda Arendt for the reverts etc she has undertaken? I have no idea why you have chosen to issue this to me - please supply evidence with diffs of where I have been uncivil in the one revert I have done of an IB since the close of the case and/or proof that I was mentioned in any way within the case, unlike the person who initiated the case, was admonished by ArbCom but still very pointedly added an IB to the article expanded by Cassianto immediately prior to his self requested block. Thanks. SagaciousPhil - Chat 20:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)