Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback

• Archive1 of the old WP:WIZ/Userfeedback
• Archive2 of the old WP:WIZ/Userfeedback
• Archive3 of the old WP:WIZ/Userfeedback
• Archive4 of the old WP:WIZ/Userfeedback
• 2010
• 2011
• Q1 2012
• Q2 2012
• Q3 2012
• Q4 2012
• 2013
• 2014
• 2015
• 2016
• 2017

Feedback from Patpatrick (13 January 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• The instructions are clear to follow and easy.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• It was very quick and efficient

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• Just because an editor does not have knowledge on a particular topic should note just make new articles for deletion. is really annoying and needs to be looked at. Editors should be unbiased.

Feedback from Internetangel (17 January 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• 33 days

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• No

Feedback from Springer54 (18 January 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• it was not easy for me

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• only one day

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 205.152.51.2 (19 January 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Thanks for accepting the article before the season started. I'm sure someone is working on the companion page for the women's team, the Orlando Pride. Orlando City B is not going to field a team this year.

Feedback from Kusi David Toh (4 February 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes I found some clear and with further questions you clarified me on what to do. Thank you for approving my article

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• It took approximately a month and half

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• for the moment, no. But I wish you guide me on how to insert images or pictures.

 Done Replied on user talk page. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from GreyGreenWhy (9 February 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes to the extent that I used them, but the teahouse experts did most of the template things.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• Very quickly, under 1 month from submission.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• Feedback on how to improve article when accepted maybe.

GreyGreenWhy (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Yrarendar (17 February 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• Good turnaround time

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• No - KJP1 was extremely helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yrarendar (talk • contribs) 06:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from The-landmark (20 February 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes. Complex but clear

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• Around 8 weeks

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• It seems to work well and once into it reasonably straightforward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The-landmark (talk • contribs) 19:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Rafaelsantino (26 February 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• i´m still learning about the reliable sources

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• 60 days its ok you have more than 2600 articles to review :-)

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• -

--Rafaelsantino (talk) 23:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Jakebroadhurst (5 March 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• Seemed pretty quick

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• no. Just big gratitude! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakebroadhurst (talk • contribs) 17:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Yourmistake (15 March 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• actually little late because one same article already created after my submission.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• yes please delete one of the article Abhrahaminte Santhathikal Abrahaminte Santhathikal

Yourmistake (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done Duplicate article deleted. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Raricrod (22 March 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• I really thank you for the help!!!!!!--Raricrod (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from ASCAndrea (5 April 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

• yes!

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

• Within a day.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

• I find the citation process cumbersome. It would be good to have immediate instructions as the citations help solidify the content of the submission. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASCAndrea (talk • contribs) 06:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done Query answered on user talk page. jcc (tea and biscuits) 22:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Yesterdaysfire (6 April 2018)

Did you find the instructions clear?

I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published..

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Not very quickly! But, I know how hard it is! There are tons of articles in review!

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

I suppose follow up as best as possible? I can't find the link to the article anywhere? I'm not sure it's been published..