Jump to content

Talk:Fable III: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 54: Line 54:
== Open world ==
== Open world ==


Why isn't this part of the ''open world video games'' category? The summary of the article opens by stating it is an open world game!
Why isn't this part of the ''open world video games'' category? The summary of the article starts by stating it is an open world game!

Revision as of 00:31, 10 August 2018

WikiProject iconVideo games C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Mixed reviews?

Reception section says game received "mixed reviews", yet does not display a single score below 7/10, and even had one perfect 5. Either the game was received positive, not mixed, or negative reviews are being excluded. 217.209.215.127 (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree negative reviews should be mentioned, "mixed" is incorrect since the average indication is mostly 80, which is favorable. One could argue mixed based on the fact there are some more negative reviews but one could also argue that with pretty much any game, film, book etc since not everything is perfect. This is why wiki uses website averages. Stabby Joe (talk) 15:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fancruft

So much fancruft in here... its like walking in sewage.--Blue Tie (talk) 17:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

Doesn't help when fan boys delete anything they don't agree with either...monkey sauce

OXM review

offical xbox magazine a major game critic gave fable 3 a 9 out of 10 can someone add that since fable is a big part of the xbox community? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.175.172.240 (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler

Why is the major plot line spoiled in the start of the wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.77.241 (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This part? "After a successful revolt, the player becomes the monarch and can then lead Albion in whichever direction they please." It's called "what has been known since the game was announced." --86.142.78.113 (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pc requirements should be added to the article

please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can view the system requirements here Jespertp (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fable III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Open world

Why isn't this part of the open world video games category? The summary of the article starts by stating it is an open world game!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fable_III&oldid=854252194"