Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSIOS: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Cybersecurity provider for the US government, coverage in different publications + awards.I am the author of the article. [[User:Globe2trotter|Globe2trotter]] ([[User talk:Globe2trotter|talk]]) 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC) |
*Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Cybersecurity provider for the US government, coverage in different publications + awards.I am the author of the article. [[User:Globe2trotter|Globe2trotter]] ([[User talk:Globe2trotter|talk]]) 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' above keep !vote is unsubstantiated, minor awards do not confer notability. None of the sources pass [[WP:NCORP]] standards, being interviews with no independant analysis or content (e.g the "top 50 brands" [https://thesiliconreview.com/magazines/csios-corporation-raising-the-bar-on-u-s-government-cyberspace-operations-and-cybersecurity-services/ article]), or routine coverage likely based on press releases [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|pingó mió]]) 12:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' above keep !vote is unsubstantiated, minor awards do not confer notability. None of the sources pass [[WP:NCORP]] standards, being interviews with no independant analysis or content (e.g the "top 50 brands" [https://thesiliconreview.com/magazines/csios-corporation-raising-the-bar-on-u-s-government-cyberspace-operations-and-cybersecurity-services/ article]), or routine coverage likely based on press releases [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|pingó mió]]) 12:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
Comment - There are no interviews and no press releases in the list of references used. Infact, I can't find many press releases the company has issued. I respect your views on awards. I did have my doubts but I concluded otherwise given those are the major awards within the industry. [[User:Globe2trotter|Globe2trotter]] ([[User talk:Globe2trotter|talk]]) 07:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:24, 19 September 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CSIOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE, citations are to coverage that is largely routine and not in reliable sources. Web searches return much the same. Rosguilltalk 06:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 07:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 07:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 01:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 01:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Cybersecurity provider for the US government, coverage in different publications + awards.I am the author of the article. Globe2trotter (talk) 02:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete above keep !vote is unsubstantiated, minor awards do not confer notability. None of the sources pass WP:NCORP standards, being interviews with no independant analysis or content (e.g the "top 50 brands" article), or routine coverage likely based on press releases Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment - There are no interviews and no press releases in the list of references used. Infact, I can't find many press releases the company has issued. I respect your views on awards. I did have my doubts but I concluded otherwise given those are the major awards within the industry. Globe2trotter (talk) 07:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)