Jump to content

User talk:Huff slush7264: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Your email: new section
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


{{unblock reviewed | 1=Again, I am sorry for sockpuppetry. I will try not to disrupt the wiki, and I am very sorry for what I have done. I will hopefully create new articles, and some of the accounts I did not know what sockpuppetry was. I will never ever super duper do sockpuppetry again, for these results, I am nothing. Sockpuppetry is not a good idea. I will make constructive contributions, and will never do it again. Thank you. | decline = Oh, I wonder how many reasons I can think of for declining this unblock request. Here are just a few: (1) If you were so upset about being blocked from Wikipedia that you were "literally crying" about it then you are far too sensitive to survive as a Wikipedia editor, so unblocking you would not be good for you. (2) Your unblock requests are full of lies so blatant that you must think we are stupid, or else you are so stupid yourself that you can't see how totally obvious your lies are, or else you are trolling. In none of those situations would unblocking you be a good idea. (3) Despite saying that you will never use sockpuppets again, you have continued to use at least one sockpuppet after posting this unblock request, so obviously you can't be trusted. I am in two minds as to whether to remove talk page access to prevent you from wasting yet another administrator's time with another unblock request as pointless as the ones you have posted so far. If I don't, and you post another unblock request like these, then do expect to have talk page access removed. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 19:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Again, I am sorry for sockpuppetry. I will try not to disrupt the wiki, and I am very sorry for what I have done. I will hopefully create new articles, and some of the accounts I did not know what sockpuppetry was. I will never ever super duper do sockpuppetry again, for these results, I am nothing. Sockpuppetry is not a good idea. I will make constructive contributions, and will never do it again. Thank you. | decline = Oh, I wonder how many reasons I can think of for declining this unblock request. Here are just a few: (1) If you were so upset about being blocked from Wikipedia that you were "literally crying" about it then you are far too sensitive to survive as a Wikipedia editor, so unblocking you would not be good for you. (2) Your unblock requests are full of lies so blatant that you must think we are stupid, or else you are so stupid yourself that you can't see how totally obvious your lies are, or else you are trolling. In none of those situations would unblocking you be a good idea. (3) Despite saying that you will never use sockpuppets again, you have continued to use at least one sockpuppet after posting this unblock request, so obviously you can't be trusted. I am in two minds as to whether to remove talk page access to prevent you from wasting yet another administrator's time with another unblock request as pointless as the ones you have posted so far. If I don't, and you post another unblock request like these, then do expect to have talk page access removed. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 19:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)}}

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User talk:THIS IS JUST A TEST12/Please do not edit this line]]==
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User talk:THIS IS JUST A TEST12/Please do not edit this line]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
Line 30: Line 29:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:User talk:THIS IS JUST A TEST12/Please do not edit this line|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 14:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:User talk:THIS IS JUST A TEST12/Please do not edit this line|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ''[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]'' <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 14:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
:I agree. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''Huff slush7264'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">talk</span>]] 14:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
:I agree. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''Huff slush7264'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">talk</span>]] 14:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=I am still standing strong to edit. I am nothing without Wikipedia, and would really like to edit. What sockpuppet did I use? I did not use one. If I did, please tell me. I am very very sorry, already said, and will never use sockpuppets again.(1) I am not sensitive, I have survived a lot of bad things happening to me. I am really trying, and I did not use any sock puppets. I am really sorry for what I have done, and all I have tried to do was improve this wiki, not disrupt it. I do admit for creating all of the socks, and I promise, JamesBWatson, to you that I trust you, I trust all admins, and understand that. I just really want to cheer people like you up, not to make them so mad that they disrupt me. To JamesBWatson, I am truly sorry and will never ever do it again. I will always trust you and believe in you. Thank you and goodbye. I never lie, but I do admit creating them. I promise you, and I really trust you. I really do not mean to, and really, to all admins, try to make this wiki, and the world, a better place. No matter what happens, I will stay strong, never cry, and always trust you. Thank you. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''CURRENLY BLOCKED'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">TRY AGAIN WHEN UNBLOCKED</span>]] 20:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)}}

== Your email ==

Your email has added essentially more of the same that your disingenuous unblock requests have provided. As a result, I have decided to go ahead with removing talk page access and email access. (I '''had''' decided to leave it, to give you an opportunity to make a constructive unblock request if you chose to.) <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 20:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:31, 25 October 2018

CURRENTLY BLOCKED. TRY AGAIN LATER WHEN UNBLOCKED. HOPEFULLY WILL BE BACK TO EDITING. THANK YOU.  EDIT ON! ^_^
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huff slush7264 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am truthfully sorry for the disruptive activities. I only created one extra account, and when I did, it was a joke and I did not actually mean to create it. Thank you. I am very shocked to notice that. I am very stricken with grief to do such a horrible thing to this wiki, as I thought it would be fun. So sorry. It is not me who has created those accounts. Why would I do that? THIS IS JUST A TEST12 is for warnings and blocks. I thought that was not sockpuppetry. I am very sad for doing that and will never again. I am literally crying right now. It is a shared IP address, so why am I blocked? =( Huff slush7264 talk 17:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You quite simply are not telling the truth here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huff slush7264 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am faithfully sorry for what I have done. I am a new editor, and I did not know that doing that (even by accident) was so bad to this wiki. I would like to continue to improve this wiki to have lots more articles. I deeply regret it. I am nothing without Wikipedia, so thank you and goodbye.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huff slush7264 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Again, I am sorry for sockpuppetry. I will try not to disrupt the wiki, and I am very sorry for what I have done. I will hopefully create new articles, and some of the accounts I did not know what sockpuppetry was. I will never ever super duper do sockpuppetry again, for these results, I am nothing. Sockpuppetry is not a good idea. I will make constructive contributions, and will never do it again. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Oh, I wonder how many reasons I can think of for declining this unblock request. Here are just a few: (1) If you were so upset about being blocked from Wikipedia that you were "literally crying" about it then you are far too sensitive to survive as a Wikipedia editor, so unblocking you would not be good for you. (2) Your unblock requests are full of lies so blatant that you must think we are stupid, or else you are so stupid yourself that you can't see how totally obvious your lies are, or else you are trolling. In none of those situations would unblocking you be a good idea. (3) Despite saying that you will never use sockpuppets again, you have continued to use at least one sockpuppet after posting this unblock request, so obviously you can't be trusted. I am in two minds as to whether to remove talk page access to prevent you from wasting yet another administrator's time with another unblock request as pointless as the ones you have posted so far. If I don't, and you post another unblock request like these, then do expect to have talk page access removed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User talk:THIS IS JUST A TEST12/Please do not edit this line, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Huff slush7264 talk 14:29, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Huff slush7264 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am still standing strong to edit. I am nothing without Wikipedia, and would really like to edit. What sockpuppet did I use? I did not use one. If I did, please tell me. I am very very sorry, already said, and will never use sockpuppets again.(1) I am not sensitive, I have survived a lot of bad things happening to me. I am really trying, and I did not use any sock puppets. I am really sorry for what I have done, and all I have tried to do was improve this wiki, not disrupt it. I do admit for creating all of the socks, and I promise, JamesBWatson, to you that I trust you, I trust all admins, and understand that. I just really want to cheer people like you up, not to make them so mad that they disrupt me. To JamesBWatson, I am truly sorry and will never ever do it again. I will always trust you and believe in you. Thank you and goodbye. I never lie, but I do admit creating them. I promise you, and I really trust you. I really do not mean to, and really, to all admins, try to make this wiki, and the world, a better place. No matter what happens, I will stay strong, never cry, and always trust you. Thank you. CURRENLY BLOCKED TRY AGAIN WHEN UNBLOCKED 20:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am still standing strong to edit. I am nothing without Wikipedia, and would really like to edit. What sockpuppet did I use? I did not use one. If I did, please tell me. I am very very sorry, already said, and will never use sockpuppets again.(1) I am not sensitive, I have survived a lot of bad things happening to me. I am really trying, and I did not use any sock puppets. I am really sorry for what I have done, and all I have tried to do was improve this wiki, not disrupt it. I do admit for creating all of the socks, and I promise, JamesBWatson, to you that I trust you, I trust all admins, and understand that. I just really want to cheer people like you up, not to make them so mad that they disrupt me. To JamesBWatson, I am truly sorry and will never ever do it again. I will always trust you and believe in you. Thank you and goodbye. I never lie, but I do admit creating them. I promise you, and I really trust you. I really do not mean to, and really, to all admins, try to make this wiki, and the world, a better place. No matter what happens, I will stay strong, never cry, and always trust you. Thank you. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''CURRENLY BLOCKED'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">TRY AGAIN WHEN UNBLOCKED</span>]] 20:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am still standing strong to edit. I am nothing without Wikipedia, and would really like to edit. What sockpuppet did I use? I did not use one. If I did, please tell me. I am very very sorry, already said, and will never use sockpuppets again.(1) I am not sensitive, I have survived a lot of bad things happening to me. I am really trying, and I did not use any sock puppets. I am really sorry for what I have done, and all I have tried to do was improve this wiki, not disrupt it. I do admit for creating all of the socks, and I promise, JamesBWatson, to you that I trust you, I trust all admins, and understand that. I just really want to cheer people like you up, not to make them so mad that they disrupt me. To JamesBWatson, I am truly sorry and will never ever do it again. I will always trust you and believe in you. Thank you and goodbye. I never lie, but I do admit creating them. I promise you, and I really trust you. I really do not mean to, and really, to all admins, try to make this wiki, and the world, a better place. No matter what happens, I will stay strong, never cry, and always trust you. Thank you. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''CURRENLY BLOCKED'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">TRY AGAIN WHEN UNBLOCKED</span>]] 20:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am still standing strong to edit. I am nothing without Wikipedia, and would really like to edit. What sockpuppet did I use? I did not use one. If I did, please tell me. I am very very sorry, already said, and will never use sockpuppets again.(1) I am not sensitive, I have survived a lot of bad things happening to me. I am really trying, and I did not use any sock puppets. I am really sorry for what I have done, and all I have tried to do was improve this wiki, not disrupt it. I do admit for creating all of the socks, and I promise, JamesBWatson, to you that I trust you, I trust all admins, and understand that. I just really want to cheer people like you up, not to make them so mad that they disrupt me. To JamesBWatson, I am truly sorry and will never ever do it again. I will always trust you and believe in you. Thank you and goodbye. I never lie, but I do admit creating them. I promise you, and I really trust you. I really do not mean to, and really, to all admins, try to make this wiki, and the world, a better place. No matter what happens, I will stay strong, never cry, and always trust you. Thank you. [[User:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: teal">'''CURRENLY BLOCKED'''</span>]] [[User talk:Huff slush7264|<span style="color: orange">TRY AGAIN WHEN UNBLOCKED</span>]] 20:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}