Jump to content

Talk:Internalized racism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spaul57 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Hoopsf (talk | contribs)
added comment about copying and pasting work
Line 33: Line 33:
== Peer Review Comments #2 ==
== Peer Review Comments #2 ==
You did such a great job revising this article, Hope! I really enjoyed reading it and felt like I learned a lot, especially from all of the sections that were not present before. I think that the different psychological references are genuinely interesting, the writing is extremely clear, and the organization and neutrality seem carefully thought out. The main thing I would focus on improving is adding some more explanation and content to sections such as Dimensions, Measures, and Health, and there are some parts that could use more than one source or just one (which I mentioned in my rubric). This way, readers will have more validation for the information and will also be able to more fully understand certain concepts. In addition, 1-2 images may be a nice addition to the article. Can’t wait to see the finished product! [[User:Spaul57|Sachi Paul]] ([[User talk:Spaul57|talk]]) 03:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
You did such a great job revising this article, Hope! I really enjoyed reading it and felt like I learned a lot, especially from all of the sections that were not present before. I think that the different psychological references are genuinely interesting, the writing is extremely clear, and the organization and neutrality seem carefully thought out. The main thing I would focus on improving is adding some more explanation and content to sections such as Dimensions, Measures, and Health, and there are some parts that could use more than one source or just one (which I mentioned in my rubric). This way, readers will have more validation for the information and will also be able to more fully understand certain concepts. In addition, 1-2 images may be a nice addition to the article. Can’t wait to see the finished product! [[User:Spaul57|Sachi Paul]] ([[User talk:Spaul57|talk]]) 03:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

== Moving some page elements ==
I am moving some of the content that I did not contribute to fit the organizational structure I planned for the page. Please let me know if there are any problems with this.
[[User:Hoopsf|Hoopsf]] ([[User talk:Hoopsf|talk]]) 15:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:50, 10 November 2018

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hoopsf (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Prisci8, Spaul57.

Why did you delete Ethan Klein from this page?

Maybe we can compromise. Please tell me your sorrows. NessThePSIKid (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It did not have any reliable sources and is unrelated to the concept of internalized racism. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 21:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Revisions

I am interested in expanding this page to include more discussion about the psychological effects of internalized racism. It would also benefit this page to discuss more than perceptions of beauty in terms of the way that internalized racism can manifest. Specifically, I would discuss the relation of internalized racism to stereotype threat (and subsequent testing performance, for example).

An article that discusses these points is “A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage” by Ruth A. Lamont, Hannah J. Swift, and Dominic Abrams. This example of stereotype threat shows a measurable effect of internalized racism and why it is harmful.

I'd be happy to hear any other suggestions or thoughts but this is my initial interest.

Hoopsf (talk) 18:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update

I have done a little more initial research and I want to change the organization of the article to have a section on manifestations of internalized racism, then significant regional examples throughout the world, its implications and responses to internalized racism. For more details on my proposed changes you can see my sandbox.

Hoopsf (talk) 15:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Comments #1

Hi @Hoopsf:, really great work on making the article have a widespread overview of the topic and using a concise and straightforward writing style to convey information throughout the article! I especially liked how you included measurements of internalized racism under the "Terminology and Classification" section; this provides the quantitative methods researchers used in their studies in internalized racism. Suggestions for improvement include adding more citations throughout the article and more examples under "Implications" and "Responses". I think the most important thing to improve on is providing more examples to broaden the scope of the topic and to provide different avenues of further research that the reader can explore.Prisci8 (talk) 00:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Comments #2

You did such a great job revising this article, Hope! I really enjoyed reading it and felt like I learned a lot, especially from all of the sections that were not present before. I think that the different psychological references are genuinely interesting, the writing is extremely clear, and the organization and neutrality seem carefully thought out. The main thing I would focus on improving is adding some more explanation and content to sections such as Dimensions, Measures, and Health, and there are some parts that could use more than one source or just one (which I mentioned in my rubric). This way, readers will have more validation for the information and will also be able to more fully understand certain concepts. In addition, 1-2 images may be a nice addition to the article. Can’t wait to see the finished product! Sachi Paul (talk) 03:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving some page elements

I am moving some of the content that I did not contribute to fit the organizational structure I planned for the page. Please let me know if there are any problems with this. Hoopsf (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]