Talk:Johanna Budwig: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:32, 24 December 2018

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Alternative medicine Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women scientists Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Further discussion

A problem with this article is a lack of reliable secondary sources. If none can be found then I suggest merging the article with flaxseed, where there is a section of nutrients and clinical research.[1] TFD (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean all of the links show in this version of the article, that were all recently removed by User:Nunquam Dormio. Not to mention the references that are shown in the section above? I do not believe this article should be merged, there are sources for it, people just keep removing them. Silverseren^C 00:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources I removed were really top-grade: indeed two of them were advertisements. Other than to prove that her diet still has its supporters, they don't add much. The Four Deuces, I can't see merging a biographical article with one about flaxseed is ever going to be an option. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 15:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Budwig and Light

Can something be made of this? Silverseren^C 04:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And this. Silverseren^C 04:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another. Silverseren^C 04:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And another. Silverseren^C 04:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And perhaps you should add this: Paper Chromatography The foundation of lipid science- the development of paper chromatography In the late 1940s, Dr. Johanna Budwig succeeded in developing a process by which fats could be broken down and analyzed based on their smallest components. A great achievement for both Dr. Johanna Budwig as well as for the entire scientific community.

“It was through the development of paper chromatography in the field of lipid research- in other words, through novel examination of fatty substances on paper- which I (Dr. Budwig) initially carried out in 1949 without any idea of how great an impact it would have on the entire field of medicine, which allowed a thousandth of a milligram of fat to be analyzed on paper. One thousandth of a milligram of fat, taken from approximately one drop of blood, could now be separated into its various constituents and could accurately characterized according to its various fatty acid components. “ - Dr. Johanna Budwig

from https://www.budwig-stiftung.de/en/dr-johanna-budwig/her-research.html

Arydberg (talk) 04:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Funny thing

how http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/about-cancer/cancer-questions/what-is-the-budwig-diet can claim there's no proof of diet/cancer relation as if they reviewed all the published work. here's a simple counter example: Prof Campbell, a Cornell University academic who grew up milking cows and slaughtering animals on his family's Virginia farm, began his research to back up his belief that traditional Western diets rich in protein from dairy and meat "was the best you could get". Instead, he told The Sunday Telegraph, after studying diets, lifestyle and disease in 2,800 counties across China and Taiwan, he concluded the opposite - that plant-based diets dramatically and rapidly reduce heart disease, diabetes, cancer and obesity. [2] 178.221.220.214 (talk) 07:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They "claim" no such thing. Quack/altmed diets don't work, but there's a well-acknowledged interplay between diet and cancer generally. See here for example. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 07:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Add) And we have an entire article on the subject: Diet and cancer. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 07:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Johanna Budwig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arrogance

You did it again. Your statement "There is no evidence that this or other "anti-cancer" diet is effective."[2] is totally absurd. You can say what you want about the Budwig Diet but to extend that statement to everything in the entire world is supreme arrogance. You are extending your argument to things you have no knowledge of. Please try again. Arydberg (talk) 03:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We reflect accepted knowledge in reliable sources, and this is such. Alexbrn (talk) 07:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you tell me what are your sources for "OTHER anti cancer diets" Do they include those that you have no knowledge of? 108.34.143.147 (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See PMID 23152069. Alexbrn (talk) 01:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you said "many other diets" at least it would have been a correct statement but to use the term "other" is way too far ranging. It is simply wrong. Have you looked at the diet that may be published tomorrow? Arydberg (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/108.34.143.147|108.34.143.147]] ([[User talk:108.34.143.147|talk]]) 23:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 :See PMID 23152069. [[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] ([[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]) 01:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
+If you said "many other diets" at least it would have been a correct statement but to use the term "other" is way too far ranging.  It is simply wrong.  Have you looked at the diet that may be published tomorrow?
+[[User:Arydberg|Arydberg]] ([[User talk:Arydberg|talk]]) 17:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)