Talk:Bison latifrons: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:00, 5 January 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bison latifrons article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mammals Start‑class Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Palaeontology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Extinction Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Untitled

The text says that Latifrons went extinct about 20 ka bp, but the image shows a vertebra with a (presumably human) Atlatl point in it, dated to 4-3.5 ka bp. 98.248.37.60 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bison latifrons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927182838/http://www.royalsaskmuseum.ca/research/faqs/ex_9.shtml to http://www.royalsaskmuseum.ca/research/faqs/ex_9.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This bison never had over 3000kg and over 2.5m at the shoulder

Why some users are keep changing this? http://library.sandiegozoo.org/factsheets/_extinct/bison_extinct/bison_summary.html Porbably even the 2000kg weight is wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe because you rarely bother providing a reliable citation and then attack other users in order to assert ownership of articles?--Mr Fink (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rarely? Every edit I made have reliable citation. I never attacked other users, I only defend myself, the only guy I "attacked" was the one who call me nobody (you), I wasn't the one who started this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk • contribs)

So, can you go ahead and provide some reliable citations, like from a scientific journal or text, that back up the changes in dimensions you've made already, or are you going to continue proving my own point?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, as always I provide reliable sources I don't know what you are talking about. If it's in this page, in case you don't know some users are changing the weight and height 0f 2000kg to over 3000kg and 2.5m to 2.7m or something withouyt any sources, I don't see you complaining about that and you went as far as supporting vandalism from those users (by changing the correct body size of this bison) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://books.google.pt/books?id=kUAKgNfiAvoC&pg=PA113&dq=Bison+latifrons+body+size&hl=pt-PT&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZyOG9qdXfAhUIlhQKHXIwAQAQ6AEIMTAB#v=onepage&q=Bison%20latifrons%20body%20size&f=false Found something here. The weight is listed as 1250kg, now this is a reliable source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.48.210.235 (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC) https://books.google.pt/books?id=-QxQAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&dq=Bison+latifrons+body+size&hl=pt-PT&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZyOG9qdXfAhUIlhQKHXIwAQAQ6AEIQzAD#v=onepage&q=Bison%20latifrons%20body%20size&f=false Another, "somewhat larger than the modern bison"[reply]