Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIMAL: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Delete |
→MIMAL: Comment |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Weak Keep''' – Though not covered by the New York Times there is enough secondary coverage to warrant a spot here at Wikipedia. However, would change the piece’s name to “MAMIL” (geographical acronym) in that just the Acronym “MAMIL” (Middle aged man in Lycra) is gaining quite a bit of attention in the cycling world and can see an article here in a very short time.<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 15:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Weak Keep''' – Though not covered by the New York Times there is enough secondary coverage to warrant a spot here at Wikipedia. However, would change the piece’s name to “MAMIL” (geographical acronym) in that just the Acronym “MAMIL” (Middle aged man in Lycra) is gaining quite a bit of attention in the cycling world and can see an article here in a very short time.<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 15:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
::What sources cover this? Also, there's already a [[mamil]] article, it has nothing to do with this.--[[User:Rusf10|Rusf10]] ([[User talk:Rusf10|talk]]) 15:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
::What sources cover this? Also, there's already a [[mamil]] article, it has nothing to do with this.--[[User:Rusf10|Rusf10]] ([[User talk:Rusf10|talk]]) 15:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
:::'''Comment''' – My fault “Fat Finger”/typo……again apologies on MAMIL versus MIMAL…with regards to references a Google search does give a number of secondary sources, quality ahhhhh. That is way a Weak Keep. Thanks. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 18:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. Poorly sourced cruft. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 18:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Poorly sourced cruft. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 18:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:51, 20 March 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MIMAL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any reliable source that actually uses this term. Delete as per WP:V and WP:NOTNEO Rusf10 (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The links in the article seem reliable enough to pass muster. the folklore it originates in is established, and if the acronym is a learning device used in current education, that furthers the case. Keep, barring further developments. Scriblerian1 (talk) 23:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- The two sources are acronymfinder.com and a blog. How are those acceptable sources?--Rusf10 (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
del nn piece of folklore, among zillions of smarticisms in popculture. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:52, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Keep – Though not covered by the New York Times there is enough secondary coverage to warrant a spot here at Wikipedia. However, would change the piece’s name to “MAMIL” (geographical acronym) in that just the Acronym “MAMIL” (Middle aged man in Lycra) is gaining quite a bit of attention in the cycling world and can see an article here in a very short time.ShoesssS Talk 15:11, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- What sources cover this? Also, there's already a mamil article, it has nothing to do with this.--Rusf10 (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment – My fault “Fat Finger”/typo……again apologies on MAMIL versus MIMAL…with regards to references a Google search does give a number of secondary sources, quality ahhhhh. That is way a Weak Keep. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 18:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- What sources cover this? Also, there's already a mamil article, it has nothing to do with this.--Rusf10 (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly sourced cruft. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)