Talk:Ginzburg–Landau theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:26, 23 March 2019

Physics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please fix reference

Someone who knows how, please fix the last citation Gaiotto, Gukov, Seiberg. This should appear in the ref list and just be a cited number I would think.

Husumi Q

Anyone have any idea why this links to Husumi Q. Seems pretty off-topic to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.71.110 (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no resistance

tell me all about how resistance becomes zero(superconductivity)

It's don't become zero, but almost zero. There all electrons going in ground level orbits and thus there is more free electrons, which can move freely without atracting them from orbits and thus vasting energy and thermal motion of molecules disapearing and friction also and electrons can move more freely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weekwhom (talk • contribs) 15:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at BCS theory. Electrons distort the lattice they are in, weakly attract, pair up, and form a bose condensate of sorts. As bosons, they can move about freely. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Electron superfluid

I think that this does not deserve to be entered under a new heading. It should follow the first section as Ginzburg's interpretation of order parameter ψ.

And there is an error in the statement: F is not a complex function.

TomyDuby (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Electromagnetic vector potential?

In the introduction, A is defined to be the electromagnetic vector potential. But if B=curl(A), isn't A the magnetic vector potential? This seems to be the implication from the Wikipedia entry on vector potential. Wikimedes (talk) 19:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone already made the change. At more advanced levels, people get sloppy about what they call things, since its always obvious (to them) what is meant. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 23:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Simple interpretation" section

"The magnitude of a complex number must be non-zero number, so only ψ = 0 solves the Ginzburg–Landau equation." Should this read "non-negative" instead of "non-zero"? Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 06:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, someone fixed this already. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

temperature?

how the change of temperature appears in the equation?Klinfran (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How does it explain higher critical field in smaller particles

Indium nitride says " the superconductivity is attributed to metallic indium chains[6] or nanoclusters, where the small size increases the critical magnetic field according to the Ginzburg–Landau theory.[8]" but its not clear here. Can it be added ? - Rod57 (talk) 04:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably read references [6] and [8]. The theory of superconductivity is huge, with many (hundreds?) of books on the topic. Elaborating this article to cover such a narrow statement won't happen (unless I am missing something very generic being invoked here). 67.198.37.16 (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{physics|class=Start|importance=mid}}
+== Please fix reference ==
+Someone who knows how, please fix the last citation Gaiotto, Gukov, Seiberg.  This should appear in the ref list and just be a cited number I would think.
 == Husumi Q ==