Jump to content

User talk:Ajgreene27: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Decline unblock
Line 3: Line 3:
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I did not understand that you weren't supposed to link to the publisher of books. I was simply trying to update the page. If unblocked, I will not link to outside sources, I will simply list. Thank you. [[User:Ajgreene27|Ajgreene27]] ([[User talk:Ajgreene27#top|talk]]) 16:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC) | decline = It's not just the links that are the problem. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I did not understand that you weren't supposed to link to the publisher of books. I was simply trying to update the page. If unblocked, I will not link to outside sources, I will simply list. Thank you. [[User:Ajgreene27|Ajgreene27]] ([[User talk:Ajgreene27#top|talk]]) 16:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC) | decline = It's not just the links that are the problem. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)}}
Are you associated with HarperCollins or anyone related to the subject matter you were editing about? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Are you associated with HarperCollins or anyone related to the subject matter you were editing about? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 16:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason= I am employed by Pete the Cat LLC and have been tasked by our legal counsel to update the Pete the Cat page.}}

Revision as of 20:05, 17 April 2019

March 2019

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89(T·C) 03:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajgreene27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not understand that you weren't supposed to link to the publisher of books. I was simply trying to update the page. If unblocked, I will not link to outside sources, I will simply list. Thank you. Ajgreene27 (talk) 16:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not just the links that are the problem. Yamla (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you associated with HarperCollins or anyone related to the subject matter you were editing about? 331dot (talk) 16:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ajgreene27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am employed by Pete the Cat LLC and have been tasked by our legal counsel to update the Pete the Cat page.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am employed by Pete the Cat LLC and have been tasked by our legal counsel to update the Pete the Cat page. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am employed by Pete the Cat LLC and have been tasked by our legal counsel to update the Pete the Cat page. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am employed by Pete the Cat LLC and have been tasked by our legal counsel to update the Pete the Cat page. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}