User talk:Nthep: Difference between revisions
→RD1: r |
→Revision deletion: new section |
||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
That said, I sometimes skip some requests because they are challenging, and I think you are the one who usually takes that one. For that, I thank you.--[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 16:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
That said, I sometimes skip some requests because they are challenging, and I think you are the one who usually takes that one. For that, I thank you.--[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 16:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
:No problem. There are some real stinkers - over 1200 revisions deleted I think is my record. [[User:Nthep|Nthep]] ([[User talk:Nthep#top|talk]]) 16:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
:No problem. There are some real stinkers - over 1200 revisions deleted I think is my record. [[User:Nthep|Nthep]] ([[User talk:Nthep#top|talk]]) 16:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Revision deletion == |
|||
Hi Nthep, I've noticed that you've recently deleted some history revisions, so I thought I could call on you. In which cases an edit summary (not the edit itself) has to be deleted? For example, an edit summary containing bad words (such as the one starting by "F") or in general offensive towards some other users might be deleted? Thanks in advance. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/5.170.47.250|5.170.47.250]] ([[User talk:5.170.47.250|talk]]) 14:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:46, 16 June 2019
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2019
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
18:50, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
- Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický
- An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
- An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
- An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.
- The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
- Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
- The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
- The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.
Nomination of Emma Jose Townsend for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Jose Townsend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Jose Townsend until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
RD1
The Kenton County School District was fairly straightforward, but because I originally removed the material, then was reverted, I decided to be hyper-cautious and let some else handle it.
That said, I sometimes skip some requests because they are challenging, and I think you are the one who usually takes that one. For that, I thank you.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- No problem. There are some real stinkers - over 1200 revisions deleted I think is my record. Nthep (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Revision deletion
Hi Nthep, I've noticed that you've recently deleted some history revisions, so I thought I could call on you. In which cases an edit summary (not the edit itself) has to be deleted? For example, an edit summary containing bad words (such as the one starting by "F") or in general offensive towards some other users might be deleted? Thanks in advance. 5.170.47.250 (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)