Talk:Critical thinking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:19, 1 August 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critical thinking article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 120 days

Psychology C‑class High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic / Ethics C‑class High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Ethics

Business C‑class High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education C‑class High‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Vital article

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alinamartell579 (article contribs).

Critical thinking in tutorials

With regards to tutorials in Oxford, Durham, Cambridge and LSE - in particular, it is likely that tutorials in Durham do not function like the author thinks they do.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.138.192 (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be abduction instead of adduction

I see two places where the word "adduction" might be better changed to "abduction" unless I am missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1016:82E8:DDEC:F334:AC27:B6E3 (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 {{WikiProject Education|class=C|importance=High}}
 {{WikiProject Skepticism|class=C|attention=|importance=High}}
+{{Vital article|class=C|topic=Philosophy|level=4}}
 }}
 {{Backwardscopy
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 }}
 {{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Miami_Dade_College/FYE_Seminar_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Alinamartell579|Alinamartell579]] }}
 ==Critical thinking in tutorials==