User talk:Kautilya3

Please comment on Talk:United States involvement in regime change

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States involvement in regime change. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ilhan Omar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ilhan Omar. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Indo-pak war pages

hi can you have a look at this user:Pak-Egale really making mess of articles related to the topic, may be a sock ? quite amazed at other users jumping in together , no idea where to complain Shrikanthv (talk) 13:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

@Shrikanthv: I think Ponyo continues to watch the editor. I notice that their edit today at Battle of Burki is similar to the old edits before the recent block. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Kashmir conflict iaf role

How can IAF be removed as 1965 war and Kargil 1999 war whose epicenter was Kashmir...IAF had been a very important part of it....and then you have balakot airstrikes and then next day dogfight between India and Pakistan air forces... Mayank Prasoon (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

If it is so then the name of air chief Marshal of IAF B.S Dhanoa be also removed from infobox template of Kashmir conflict page...since IAF had no role in Kashmir conflict...as my edits were reverted Mayank Prasoon (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

OK, I reinstated your edit. To tell you the truth, that whole infobox is crap because the Kashmir conflict is overall a political conflict, not a military conflict or a war. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh okay so rather remove the entire infobox and just add the name of political leaders then Mayank Prasoon (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Even including the political leaders doesn't make sense because the dispute has been going on for sixty years, and has seen many political leaders. The leaders of the current day do not in anyway summarise the whole conflict. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Southern strategy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Southern strategy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Ranjit Singh

there is no doubt in Ranjits Singh's ancestry Niether his clan claim Rajut ancestry.I personally know the royal family.Everybody know who Ranjit Singh was and he is never mentioned Sansi I can give reference but I will remove these claims 1000 times because the truth is the truth Ponia.sp (talk) 04:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

The content you deleted is sourced to reliable scholarly sources. If you do not thing it should be present, you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page and see if there are any objections. I also note that your claim of "Sandhwalia gotra" does not have a source. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work on Article 370. GSwarnkar 16:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you GSwarnkar. Nice to make your acquaintance. This will be a long road, though. This is just the beginning... -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Certain issues

Hi Kautilya I was flicking through the Gilgit-Baltistan page and in the first few paragraphs it stated that International organisations and the United nations refer to Azad and Gilgit as Pakistan administered Kashmir but they also referred to Indian side as administered by India regardless of whether it is union territory now so do you think its necessary to mention this? I think it's a bit unfair if it's high lighted prominently on Gilgit-Baltistan but not Jammu and Kashmir page double standards if you ask me please reply with a suggestion. - 82.132.243.110 (talk) 20:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

I will look into it. But the problem arises from Pakistan itself. Pakistan's constitution doesn't say that Pakistan-administered parts of Kashmir are part of Pakistan. The Census of Pakistan doesn't list those areas as being part of Pakistan. Et cetra. Obviously, Wikipedia can't say what Pakistan doesn't say. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for replying but my point was that the United Nations and other organisations both refer to Indian and Pakistani Kashmir as administered by them so why is Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan article the only one which states The UN line? its referred to as an autonomous territory mostly. I think removing the prominent message which is present on Both Azad and Gilgit article of Kashmir which states it as being administered and the UN stating its administered is fair otherwise by this logic it's only fair to have the same statement on Indian Administered Kashmir article. If you dont know which statement I'm talking about is it's the one directly below the introduction on Gilgit which mentions the UN statement which is missing on Indian administered Kashmir article I can link it if you want. Thanks I chose to speak to you as I read your contributions on the talk page and you seem neutral compared to the other nationalists who populate Wiki these days. 82.132.243.110 (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi this is the statement "the United Nations and other international organisations as "Pakistan administered Kashmir"

The same statement applies to Indian administered Kashmir so why is this statement only present on Gilgit and Azad Kashmir article it's a bit biased on my opinion. I wish to avoid edit wars and get people like you involved who are mature and balanced because it quickly degenerates into edit wars. 82.132.243.110 (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry the messages my last suggestion is calling them autonomous territory of Pakistan which is the official term used in Pakistan it's unfair to have Indias official name used for its portion of Kashmir while forcing biased terms onto Pakistans portion. Autonomous territory is what the official definition of the territory is in Pakistan. Please do look into this. 82.132.243.110 (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

   [1] This articles first reference regards it as a autonomous territory of Pakistan from the Pakistani Beurea of Statistics it's only fair to have this as the way to describe it. 82.132.243.110 (talk) 22:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

How can I demand two way interaction ban with user who is disrupting my edits in bad faith?

Can you help me to demand two way interaction ban with user who is constantly reverting my edits, being hostile, nominating my page for deletion and pushes POV on me? I just want interaction ban on that user so that he can't do it further. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 11:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

I the user in question is this one, I would suggest reporting to NinjaRobotPirate. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:51, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

For topics under discretionary sanctions, my suggestion would be to file a complaint at WP:AE. For anything else, it would probably be best to file a complaint at WP:ANI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

How

is it playing out over Kashmir related articles? ∯WBG^converse 13:20, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

It is an avalanche. What else? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm happy to throw pages I'm uninvolved with under WP:GS/IPAK. Let me know if and when it's necessary. Vanamonde (Talk) 14:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

As expected ..... Watchlisting all the pages, though. ∯WBG^converse 14:40, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Vanamonde93 it is not so much the editor conduct that is the problem, but the goofy Indian newspapers and the usual misinterpretations. We have an edit request roughly once an hour asking for something to be changed to "Union territory". But is likely to be over soon, because the Government is moving with top speed. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

• On a side-note, can you lead me to some reliable source that discusses about the old-rule of disallowing land-purchase by foreigners, in details? I checked some stuff on land-reforms but none offers an in-depth treatment. On a sidenote, the quality of media-reporting has been near-uniformly shabby from a multitude of perspectives. A Scroll piece that (supposedly) deals with my query, seems to have copied a Quora answer in toto.∯WBG^converse 14:40, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

The first paragraph of Article 35A of the Constitution of India#Background gives a summary as well as citations. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Abdul Noorani's 2011 book published by Oxford Univ Press is RS. Kautilya3: I will email you another. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:15, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Please read

After the discontinuation of Article 370 in the J&K region, Pakistan can no longer claim the region, Pakistan is already scared for PoK and hasn't yet announced a claim again on the J&K region. Also, It had been an integral part of India in the past which makes India it's parent country, has a parent country can and should claim over the disputed territory and the daughter country can no longer claim on the regions of the parent country.

That is an unsourced claim. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Article 370

Article 370 is not a Special provision to J&K but a temperory one. Vishalmenon (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC).

Then what is the purpose of undoing my edit? Vishalmenon

I must have misread it. Which page was it? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Find it out.The sentence was confusing and contradictory.So corrected it. Vishalmenon

I don't think so. Here is the revert. Your edit was not what you claim it to be. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Why are you publicizing an ignorant person like Ramchandra Guha on this article? Dagana4 (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Next United Kingdom general election

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Next United Kingdom general election. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)