Talk:Robert Elmer Kleason: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Name spelling== |
== Name spelling== |
||
The article is titled "Kleason", but all references therein are "Kleasen". |
The article is titled "Kleason", but all references therein are "Kleasen", which is the proper spelling. |
Revision as of 17:26, 28 August 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Robert Elmer Kleason article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
Latter Day Saint movement Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
(British) murderer?
Wait a minute. How could he be a "British murderer" if he was living in Texas, committed the crime (supposed crime) in Texas, and only moved to the UK 16 years later? --Michael K. Smith 03:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see how he can be considered a "murderer" at all if his conviction was reversed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.213.159 (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Name spelling
The article is titled "Kleason", but all references therein are "Kleasen", which is the proper spelling.