Jump to content

Katharine Gun: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m on/ in
citations; MOS & ce
Line 17: Line 17:
On 13 November 2003, Gun was charged with an offence under section 1 of the [[Official Secrets Act 1989]].<ref name=Beeb1>{{cite web |author=|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3268113.stm |title=Ex-GCHQ woman charged over 'leak' |date=13 November 2003|accessdate=2 February 2016|work=BBC News}}</ref> Her case became a ''[[cause célèbre]]'' among activists, and many people stepped forward to urge the government to drop the case. Among them were Reverend [[Jesse Jackson]], [[Daniel Ellsberg]] (the US government official who leaked the [[Pentagon Papers]]), and actor [[Sean Penn]], who described her as "a hero of the human spirit". Gun planned to plead "not guilty", saying in her defence that she acted to prevent imminent loss of life in a war she [[illegal war|considered illegal]].
On 13 November 2003, Gun was charged with an offence under section 1 of the [[Official Secrets Act 1989]].<ref name=Beeb1>{{cite web |author=|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3268113.stm |title=Ex-GCHQ woman charged over 'leak' |date=13 November 2003|accessdate=2 February 2016|work=BBC News}}</ref> Her case became a ''[[cause célèbre]]'' among activists, and many people stepped forward to urge the government to drop the case. Among them were Reverend [[Jesse Jackson]], [[Daniel Ellsberg]] (the US government official who leaked the [[Pentagon Papers]]), and actor [[Sean Penn]], who described her as "a hero of the human spirit". Gun planned to plead "not guilty", saying in her defence that she acted to prevent imminent loss of life in a war she [[illegal war|considered illegal]].


The case came to court on 25 February 2004. Within half an hour, the case was dropped because the prosecution declined to offer evidence.<ref name=Beeb2>{{cite web |author=|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3485072.stm |title=GCHQ translator cleared over leak |date=26 February 2004|accessdate=2 February 2016|work=BBC News}}</ref> The reasons for the prosecution dropping the case are unclear. The day before the trial, Gun's defence team had asked the government for any records of advice about the legality of the war that it had received during the run-up to the war. A full trial might have exposed any such documents to public scrutiny as the defence were expected to argue that trying to stop an illegal act (that of an illegal [[war of aggression]]) trumped Gun's obligations under the Official Secrets Act 1989. Speculation was rife in the media that the prosecution service had bowed to political pressure to drop the case so that any such documents would remain secret.{{Citation needed|date=April 2018}} However, a Government spokesman said that the decision to drop the case had been made before the defence's demands had been submitted.{{Citation needed|date=April 2018}} ''[[The Guardian]]'' newspaper had reported plans to drop the case the previous week.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/feb/22/iraq.freedomofinformation|title=GCHQ mother: My girl is not a traitor|last=Bright|first=Martin|date=2004-02-22|website=the Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-04-12}}</ref> On the day of the court case, Gun said "I'm just baffled that in the 21st century we as human beings are still dropping bombs on each other as a means to resolve issues."{{fact|date=October 2018}} In 2019 ''The Guardian'' stated the case was dropped "when the prosecution realised that evidence would emerge ... that even British government lawyers believed the invasion was unlawful."<ref name=guardian-20190504>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/may/04/official-secrets-act-gavin-williamson-prosecution |title=Leaking or briefing? Inside the world of ministers' secrets |last=Norton-Taylor |first=Richard |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 May 2019 |accessdate=6 May 2019}}</ref>
The case came to court on 25 February 2004. Within half an hour, the case was dropped because the prosecution declined to offer evidence.<ref name=Beeb2>{{cite web |author=|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3485072.stm |title=GCHQ translator cleared over leak |date=26 February 2004|accessdate=2 February 2016|work=BBC News}}</ref> The reasons for the prosecution dropping the case are unclear. The day before the trial, Gun's defence team had asked the government for any records of advice about the legality of the war that it had received during the run-up to the war. A full trial might have exposed any such documents to public scrutiny as the defence were expected to argue that trying to stop an illegal act (that of an illegal [[war of aggression]]) trumped Gun's obligations under the Official Secrets Act 1989. Speculation was rife in the media that the prosecution service had bowed to political pressure to drop the case so that any such documents would remain secret.<ref name=Beeb2/> However, a Government spokesman said that the decision to drop the case had been made before the defence's demands had been submitted.<ref name=Beeb2/> ''[[The Guardian]]'' newspaper had reported plans to drop the case the previous week.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2004/feb/22/iraq.freedomofinformation|title=GCHQ mother: My girl is not a traitor|last=Bright|first=Martin|date=2004-02-22|website=the Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-04-12}}</ref> On the day of the court case, Gun said "I'm just baffled in the 21st century we as human beings are still dropping bombs on each other as a means to resolve issues."<ref name=Beeb2/> In 2019 ''The Guardian'' stated the case was dropped "when the prosecution realised that evidence would emerge ... that even British government lawyers believed the invasion was unlawful."<ref name=guardian-20190504>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/may/04/official-secrets-act-gavin-williamson-prosecution |title=Leaking or briefing? Inside the world of ministers' secrets |last=Norton-Taylor |first=Richard |newspaper=The Guardian |date=4 May 2019 |accessdate=6 May 2019}}</ref>


==Later life==
==Later life==
Gun received the [[Sam Adams Award]] for 2003 and was supported in her case by the UK human rights [[pressure group]] [[Liberty (pressure group)|Liberty]] and in the US by the [[Institute for Public Accuracy]]. Following the dropping of the case, Liberty commented "One wonders whether disclosure in this criminal trial might have been a little too embarrassing."{{fact|date=October 2018}}
Gun received the [[Sam Adams Award]] for 2003 and was supported in her case by the UK human rights [[pressure group]] [[Liberty (pressure group)|Liberty]] and in the US by the [[Institute for Public Accuracy]]. Following the dropping of the case, Liberty commented "One wonders whether disclosure in this criminal trial might have been a little too embarrassing."<ref name=Beeb2/>


Two years after her trial, Katharine Gun wrote an article entitled "Iran: Time to Leak" (20 March 2006), which asked [[whistleblower]]s to make public information about plans for a potential war against [[Iran]]. She urged "those in a position to do so to disclose information which relates to this planned aggression; legal advice, meetings between the [[White House]] and other intelligence agencies, assessments of Iran's threat level (or better yet, evidence that assessments have been altered), troop deployments and army notifications. Don't let "the intelligence and the facts be fixed around the policy" this time."{{fact|date=October 2018}}
Two years after her trial, Katharine Gun wrote an article entitled "Iran: Time to Leak",<ref name=TimeToLeak>{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060424203529/http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/20/iran_time_to_leak.php|date=20 March 2006|archivedate=24 April 2006|title=Iran: Time To Leak|website=TomPaine.com|url=http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/20/iran_time_to_leak.php|first=Katharine|last=Gun}}</ref> which asked [[whistleblower]]s to make public information about plans for a potential war against [[Iran]]. She urged "those in a position to do so to disclose information which relates to this planned aggression; legal advice, meetings between the [[White House]] and other intelligence agencies, assessments of Iran's threat level (or better yet, evidence that assessments have been altered), troop deployments and army notifications. Don't let 'the intelligence and the facts be fixed around the policy' this time."<ref name=TimeToLeak/>


In 2019 the film ''[[Official Secrets (film)|Official Secrets]]'', recounting Gun's actions in 2003 was released with [[Keira Knightley]] taking the part of Gun.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2018/11/sundance-film-festival-premieres-lineup-harvey-weinstein-movie-toni-morrison-miles-davis-dr-ruth-full-list-1202510342/|title=Sundance 2019: Premieres Include Harvey Weinstein Docu, Mindy Kaling, Dr. Ruth, UK Spies, Miles Davis & Ted Bundy|website=Deadline.com|first=Dominic|last=Patten|date=28 November 2018}}</ref> Also that month, Daniel Ellsberg praised the swiftness and importance of Gun taking action, saying it was in some ways more significant than his own whistleblowing on the Vietnam War.<ref>[https://vimeo.com/257307270 Daniel Ellsberg speaking about Katharine Gun – 2018]</ref> Gun participated in a lengthy interview with filmmaker [[Gavin Hood]], and the journalists who broke the story of the leaked memo, [[Martin Bright]] and [[Ed Vulliamy]], in July 2019 on the US program ''[[Democracy Now!]]''.<ref>[https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/19/katharine_gun_whistleblower_official_secrets_movie In 2003, This U.K. Whistleblower Almost Stopped the Iraq Invasion. A New Film Tells Her Story]</ref><ref>[https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/19/15_years_later_how_uk_whistleblower 15 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak a Damning Iraq War Memo]</ref>
In 2019 the film ''[[Official Secrets (film)|Official Secrets]]'', recounting Gun's actions in 2003 was released with [[Keira Knightley]] taking the part of Gun.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2018/11/sundance-film-festival-premieres-lineup-harvey-weinstein-movie-toni-morrison-miles-davis-dr-ruth-full-list-1202510342/|title=Sundance 2019: Premieres Include Harvey Weinstein Docu, Mindy Kaling, Dr. Ruth, UK Spies, Miles Davis & Ted Bundy|website=Deadline.com|first=Dominic|last=Patten|date=28 November 2018}}</ref> Also that month, Daniel Ellsberg praised the swiftness and importance of Gun taking action, saying it was in some ways more significant than his own whistleblowing on the Vietnam War.<ref>[https://vimeo.com/257307270 Daniel Ellsberg speaking about Katharine Gun – 2018]</ref> Gun participated in a lengthy interview with filmmaker [[Gavin Hood]] and the journalists who broke the story of the leaked memo, [[Martin Bright]] and [[Ed Vulliamy]], in July 2019 on the US program ''[[Democracy Now!]]''<ref>[https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/19/katharine_gun_whistleblower_official_secrets_movie In 2003, This U.K. Whistleblower Almost Stopped the Iraq Invasion. A New Film Tells Her Story]</ref><ref>[https://www.democracynow.org/2019/7/19/15_years_later_how_uk_whistleblower 15 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak a Damning Iraq War Memo]</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Official Secrets (film)]]
* [[The UN Security Council and the Iraq war]]
* [[The UN Security Council and the Iraq war]]
* [[Graymail]]
* [[Graymail]]
Line 41: Line 40:


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20060424203529/http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/20/iran_time_to_leak.php][Ms. Gun is interviewed by the Anadolu Agency http://www.turkishpress.com/news/395985/ Iran]: Time to Leak by Katharine Gun, 20 March 2006
* [http://www.turkishpress.com/news/395985/ Whistleblowing to stop the Iraq war], interview, 21 March 2014
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040401190525/http://www.accuracy.org/gun/ |date=1 April 2004 |title=The Katharine Gun case, news articles }}.
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040401190525/http://www.accuracy.org/gun/ |date=1 April 2004 |title=The Katharine Gun case, news articles }}
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20040909141051/http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04%2F09%2F09%2F1358238 Katharine Gun interview on why she blew the whistle.]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20040909141051/http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04%2F09%2F09%2F1358238 Katharine Gun interview on why she blew the whistle]
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040209030144/http://observer.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,905954,00.html |date=9 February 2004 |title=The leaked memo }}
* {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040209030144/http://observer.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12239,905954,00.html |date=9 February 2004 |title=The leaked memo }}
* [http://www.connectotel.com/marcus/katharine_gun.html Links to news stories (2003–2006) about Katharine Gun]
* [http://www.connectotel.com/marcus/katharine_gun.html Links to news stories (2003–2006) about Katharine Gun]

Revision as of 22:06, 4 September 2019

This article is about the British whistleblower. For the American gamer, see Kat Gunn.

Katharine Teresa Gun (née Harwood, born 1974) is a British translator who worked for the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), a British intelligence agency.[1] In 2003, she leaked top-secret information to the press concerning illegal activities by the United States in its push for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Some of these activities include the US National Security Agency (NSA)'s eavesdropping operations on diplomats from countries tasked with passing a second United Nations resolution on the invasion of Iraq.[2]

Early life

Gun was born in Taiwan to British parents. Her upbringing later led her to describe herself as a "third culture kid".[3] After spending her childhood in Taiwan where she attended Morrison Academy, Gun studied Japanese and Chinese at Durham University in England.[3][4] Finding it difficult to find work as a linguist, Gun applied to GCHQ after reading a newspaper advertisement for the organisation. Gun had previously been unaware of GCHQ, later saying that "I didn't have much idea about what they did...I was going into it pretty much blind. Most people do."[3]

The leak

Gun's regular job at GCHQ in Cheltenham was to translate Mandarin Chinese into English.[3] While at work at GCHQ on 31 January 2003, Gun read an email from Frank Koza, the chief of staff at the "regional targets" division of the American intelligence agency, the National Security Agency.[5]

Koza's email requested aid in a secret and illegal operation to bug the United Nations offices of six nations: Angola, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chile, Guinea, and Pakistan. These were the six "swing nations" on the UN Security Council that could determine whether the UN approved the invasion of Iraq. The plan allegedly violated the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which regulates global diplomacy.

Gun was outraged by the email, and took a printed copy of it home with her.[3] After contemplating the email over the weekend, Gun gave the email to a friend who was acquainted with journalists.[3] Gun heard no more of the email until Sunday 2 March, when she saw it reproduced on the front page of The Observer newspaper.[3] Less than a week after the Observer story, on Wednesday 5 March, Gun had confessed to her line manager at GCHQ that she had leaked the email, and was arrested. In a BBC interview with Jeremy Paxman, she said that she had not raised the matter with staff counsellors as she "honestly didn't think that would have had any practical effect."[6] Gun spent a night in police custody and was subsequently charged with breaking the Official Secrets Act eight months later.[3] The case against Gun was dropped after the prosecution declined to offer any evidence. Gun later embarked on a postgraduate degree course in global ethics at Birmingham University.[3]

Court case

On 13 November 2003, Gun was charged with an offence under section 1 of the Official Secrets Act 1989.[7] Her case became a cause célèbre among activists, and many people stepped forward to urge the government to drop the case. Among them were Reverend Jesse Jackson, Daniel Ellsberg (the US government official who leaked the Pentagon Papers), and actor Sean Penn, who described her as "a hero of the human spirit". Gun planned to plead "not guilty", saying in her defence that she acted to prevent imminent loss of life in a war she considered illegal.

The case came to court on 25 February 2004. Within half an hour, the case was dropped because the prosecution declined to offer evidence.[8] The reasons for the prosecution dropping the case are unclear. The day before the trial, Gun's defence team had asked the government for any records of advice about the legality of the war that it had received during the run-up to the war. A full trial might have exposed any such documents to public scrutiny as the defence were expected to argue that trying to stop an illegal act (that of an illegal war of aggression) trumped Gun's obligations under the Official Secrets Act 1989. Speculation was rife in the media that the prosecution service had bowed to political pressure to drop the case so that any such documents would remain secret.[8] However, a Government spokesman said that the decision to drop the case had been made before the defence's demands had been submitted.[8] The Guardian newspaper had reported plans to drop the case the previous week.[9] On the day of the court case, Gun said "I'm just baffled in the 21st century we as human beings are still dropping bombs on each other as a means to resolve issues."[8] In 2019 The Guardian stated the case was dropped "when the prosecution realised that evidence would emerge ... that even British government lawyers believed the invasion was unlawful."[10]

Later life

Gun received the Sam Adams Award for 2003 and was supported in her case by the UK human rights pressure group Liberty and in the US by the Institute for Public Accuracy. Following the dropping of the case, Liberty commented "One wonders whether disclosure in this criminal trial might have been a little too embarrassing."[8]

Two years after her trial, Katharine Gun wrote an article entitled "Iran: Time to Leak",[11] which asked whistleblowers to make public information about plans for a potential war against Iran. She urged "those in a position to do so to disclose information which relates to this planned aggression; legal advice, meetings between the White House and other intelligence agencies, assessments of Iran's threat level (or better yet, evidence that assessments have been altered), troop deployments and army notifications. Don't let 'the intelligence and the facts be fixed around the policy' this time."[11]

In 2019 the film Official Secrets, recounting Gun's actions in 2003 was released with Keira Knightley taking the part of Gun.[12] Also that month, Daniel Ellsberg praised the swiftness and importance of Gun taking action, saying it was in some ways more significant than his own whistleblowing on the Vietnam War.[13] Gun participated in a lengthy interview with filmmaker Gavin Hood and the journalists who broke the story of the leaked memo, Martin Bright and Ed Vulliamy, in July 2019 on the US program Democracy Now![14][15]

See also

References

  1. ^ IPA's editor (25 February 2004). "The Katharine Gun Case". accuracy.org. Institute for Public Accuracy. Retrieved 9 July 2013. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ "Ex-GCHQ officer 'preventing war'". BBC. 27 November 2003. Retrieved 28 December 2013.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Oliver Burkeman and Richard Norton-Taylor (26 February 2004). "The spy who wouldn't keep a secret". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  4. ^ Mitchell, Marcia; Mitchell, Thomas (2008). The Spy Who Tried to Stop a War: Katharine Gun and the Secret Plot to Sanction the Iraq Invasion.
  5. ^ Martin Bright (3 March 2013). "Katharine Gun: Ten years on what happened to the woman who revealed dirty tricks on the UN Iraq war vote?". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  6. ^ "Katharine Gun". BBC News. 26 February 2004.
  7. ^ "Ex-GCHQ woman charged over 'leak'". BBC News. 13 November 2003. Retrieved 2 February 2016.
  8. ^ a b c d e "GCHQ translator cleared over leak". BBC News. 26 February 2004. Retrieved 2 February 2016.
  9. ^ Bright, Martin (22 February 2004). "GCHQ mother: My girl is not a traitor". the Guardian. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  10. ^ Norton-Taylor, Richard (4 May 2019). "Leaking or briefing? Inside the world of ministers' secrets". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
  11. ^ a b Gun, Katharine (20 March 2006). "Iran: Time To Leak". TomPaine.com. Archived from the original on 24 April 2006.
  12. ^ Patten, Dominic (28 November 2018). "Sundance 2019: Premieres Include Harvey Weinstein Docu, Mindy Kaling, Dr. Ruth, UK Spies, Miles Davis & Ted Bundy". Deadline.com.
  13. ^ Daniel Ellsberg speaking about Katharine Gun – 2018
  14. ^ In 2003, This U.K. Whistleblower Almost Stopped the Iraq Invasion. A New Film Tells Her Story
  15. ^ 15 Years Later: How U.K. Whistleblower Katharine Gun Risked Everything to Leak a Damning Iraq War Memo

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katharine_Gun&oldid=914057905"