User talk:Magherbin

wrong person

Listen, you're conflating Sheikh Abu Baraka with Aw Barkhaadle. Two different Sheikhs who both have a similar history of spreading Islam to the Maldive islands. The sources I provided stated there were two Sheikhs. You're confusing the Morrocon one with the Somali one so please instead just make your own page and feel free to use my sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datch71s (talk • contribs) 20:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

edit war

You have been reported for your recent vandalism on other pages that you have trolled on. Anything else you do will be reported and reverted back immediately.

Hi Magherbin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Yusuf bin Ahmad al-Kawneyn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nthep (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Magherbin! You created a thread called AFD process at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Magherbin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked, I wont be abusing accounts this time and I have taken the time to read the policies of the website. The encyclopedia could use editors such as myself to edit the largely neglected articles. Magherbin (talk) 03:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to be unblocked, I wont be abusing accounts this time and I have taken the time to read the policies of the website. The encyclopedia could use editors such as myself to edit the largely neglected articles. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin#top|talk]]) 03:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked, I wont be abusing accounts this time and I have taken the time to read the policies of the website. The encyclopedia could use editors such as myself to edit the largely neglected articles. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin#top|talk]]) 03:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to be unblocked, I wont be abusing accounts this time and I have taken the time to read the policies of the website. The encyclopedia could use editors such as myself to edit the largely neglected articles. [[User:Magherbin|Magherbin]] ([[User talk:Magherbin#top|talk]]) 03:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}