Talk:Wilson Bikram Rai: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by MySock1 - "→Deleted everything, no sources left: " |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Atlantic306]] I am sorry I did not realise you were also editing the page. When you said it can't be deleted, I decided to remove crappy stuff instead. I left two reliable sources at first but checking further found that those don't support the article either. So, now there's no sources left but I left the first sentence and filmography anyway despite that. |
[[User:Atlantic306]] I am sorry I did not realise you were also editing the page. When you said it can't be deleted, I decided to remove crappy stuff instead. I left two reliable sources at first but checking further found that those don't support the article either. So, now there's no sources left but I left the first sentence and filmography anyway despite that. |
||
Anyway, the other page [[Takme |
Anyway, the other page [[Takme Buda]] can surely be deleted, as there are no reliable sources covering that subject at all. Can you delete that one? Thanks! [[User:MySock1|MySock1]] ([[User talk:MySock1|talk]]) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
** Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
** Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive [[User:Atlantic306|Atlantic306]] ([[User talk:Atlantic306|talk]]) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
***Isn't the point of reliable sources to verify things? Why can't we remove sources that are reliable if they don't verify the claim that it's apparently supporting? Thanks! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MySock1|MySock1]] ([[User talk:MySock1#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MySock1|contribs]]) 19:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
***Isn't the point of reliable sources to verify things? Why can't we remove sources that are reliable if they don't verify the claim that it's apparently supporting? Thanks! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MySock1|MySock1]] ([[User talk:MySock1#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MySock1|contribs]]) 19:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 19:08, 7 October 2019
![]() | Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
Deleted everything, no sources left
User:Atlantic306 I am sorry I did not realise you were also editing the page. When you said it can't be deleted, I decided to remove crappy stuff instead. I left two reliable sources at first but checking further found that those don't support the article either. So, now there's no sources left but I left the first sentence and filmography anyway despite that.
Anyway, the other page Takme Buda can surely be deleted, as there are no reliable sources covering that subject at all. Can you delete that one? Thanks! MySock1 (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive Atlantic306 (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Isn't the point of reliable sources to verify things? Why can't we remove sources that are reliable if they don't verify the claim that it's apparently supporting? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MySock1 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Removing reliable sources is extremely disruptive Atlantic306 (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)