Jump to content

Talk:List of protected areas of China: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎top: cleanup using AWB
→‎Comments: sources of lists?
Line 9: Line 9:
:I concur with splitting. I think the individual articles would be more easy to find and more often linked to than a single article. Also I'd like to know a bit more about what the terms mean. It's all well and good listing all the national parks, but there's no information about what these labels mean. What is the status of the parks, who is responsible for the list, who pays for the park upkeep, what special laws apply to the parks and so on. [[User:Rincewind42|Rincewind42]] ([[User talk:Rincewind42|talk]]) 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:I concur with splitting. I think the individual articles would be more easy to find and more often linked to than a single article. Also I'd like to know a bit more about what the terms mean. It's all well and good listing all the national parks, but there's no information about what these labels mean. What is the status of the parks, who is responsible for the list, who pays for the park upkeep, what special laws apply to the parks and so on. [[User:Rincewind42|Rincewind42]] ([[User talk:Rincewind42|talk]]) 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
::As per JayFang's observation, I may go ahead and re-order the sublists by province name on a simple alphabetical basis. I've re-ordered alphabetically all national parks within each province section but it will be a big job to do the whole page! It will be a useful job to do whether or not the page is split (which I think would be a good idea) cheers [[User:Geopersona|Geopersona]] ([[User talk:Geopersona|talk]]) 06:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
::As per JayFang's observation, I may go ahead and re-order the sublists by province name on a simple alphabetical basis. I've re-ordered alphabetically all national parks within each province section but it will be a big job to do the whole page! It will be a useful job to do whether or not the page is split (which I think would be a good idea) cheers [[User:Geopersona|Geopersona]] ([[User talk:Geopersona|talk]]) 06:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Geopersona,
would you add sources of the lists? For instance, I am interested in the source of this list: [[List_of_protected_areas_of_China#National_Geoparks_of_China]]
Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/109.130.171.102|109.130.171.102]] ([[User talk:109.130.171.102|talk]]) 17:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:58, 8 November 2019

WikiProject iconChina List‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconProtected areas List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

It looks like the list of the provinces under each section is ordered by the areas where they belong to. For example, the first several provinces (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, etc.) belong to North China, and then Northeast China, and so on. However, it's easier to read if ordered just by the province names.

Also, this article is too big. It appears that each section (e.g. National Nature Reserves of China, National Parks of China) itself is pretty big and justifies as a separate page. JayFang (talk) 01:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with splitting. I think the individual articles would be more easy to find and more often linked to than a single article. Also I'd like to know a bit more about what the terms mean. It's all well and good listing all the national parks, but there's no information about what these labels mean. What is the status of the parks, who is responsible for the list, who pays for the park upkeep, what special laws apply to the parks and so on. Rincewind42 (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As per JayFang's observation, I may go ahead and re-order the sublists by province name on a simple alphabetical basis. I've re-ordered alphabetically all national parks within each province section but it will be a big job to do the whole page! It will be a useful job to do whether or not the page is split (which I think would be a good idea) cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geopersona, would you add sources of the lists? For instance, I am interested in the source of this list: List_of_protected_areas_of_China#National_Geoparks_of_China Thank you. 109.130.171.102 (talk) 17:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]