User talk:Sanju the king

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sanju the king! Thank you for your contributions. I am Beeblebrox and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Beeblebrox (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Incorrect audio label for Asuran and 96

Hello there. I noticed that you put Lahari Music and T-Series for Asuran's audio label, which is incorrect and no sources to support the fact. The film's audio label is actually released under the producer's Kalaippuli Audio label with Divo as it's digital partner, which is clearly evident on the poster's release and I have included the jukebox reference to support the fact. Also, you did the same for 96, where the actual audio label for that film is under Think Music. Please do not edit it again without checking proper sources. Thanks. MaxillanPaladiusG (talk) 09:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Continued issues

Aside from the repeated lies and deception from your continued socking (see that note I left on your last sock), there are still issues with your editing that is contrary to Wikipedia policies and editing norms. You've been left messages, notices and advice across your many accounts and just don't seem to listen that well to others. That's not very helpful. Please think about the time you're wasting - both yours and other editors. Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanju the king (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I consider myself as an asset for creating good contribution to Wikipedia. I have been noticed that this user has been misused, everytime and I understand the fact, about sock-puppetting, which had been foolish in my part. I would now like to request an unblock waiting the appropriate time(In my opinion.)of six months without editing. I want to prove my professionalism and general enjoyment of being part of Wiki in making productive contributions. That is, I still wish to be a part of Wikipedia through my current account and that it will not happen again. Sanju the king (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It may be appropriate to unblock you after six months if you can properly address your rampant abuse. But it hasn't been six months yet. So you are not eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sanju the king (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the reason, why I have been blocked. I know that my account has been obviously socked by some user. But, I have no connection with Sanuj Satish 2006 or any other accounts. The block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I have been blocked unintentionally as a result because I use the same IP range. I still wish I want to be a part of Wikipedia through my current account, and that it will never happen again.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand the reason, why I have been blocked. I know that my account has been obviously socked by some user. But, I have no connection with [[User:Sanuj Satish 2006|Sanuj Satish 2006]] or any other accounts. The block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I have been blocked unintentionally as a result because I use the same IP range. I still wish I want to be a part of Wikipedia through my current account, and that it will never happen again. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the reason, why I have been blocked. I know that my account has been obviously socked by some user. But, I have no connection with [[User:Sanuj Satish 2006|Sanuj Satish 2006]] or any other accounts. The block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I have been blocked unintentionally as a result because I use the same IP range. I still wish I want to be a part of Wikipedia through my current account, and that it will never happen again. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the reason, why I have been blocked. I know that my account has been obviously socked by some user. But, I have no connection with [[User:Sanuj Satish 2006|Sanuj Satish 2006]] or any other accounts. The block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I have been blocked unintentionally as a result because I use the same IP range. I still wish I want to be a part of Wikipedia through my current account, and that it will never happen again. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

In your first unblock request, you admit to violating WP:SOCK and say this was foolish of you to do so. In your second unblock, you claim you have no connection with any other account. One of these is obviously a lie. Which one is true and why did you lie? --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

It is the truth, I need to accept that, I don't have any connection with other Wikipedia accounts. -- Sanju the king (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)