Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Tate: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:04, 11 January 2020

Kent Tate

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article subject has requested deletion of their article, VRTS ticket # 2019122410002207. This is a procedural action; I hold no opinion as to the notability of the article subject. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've contributed some minor details to this article, mostly because the main contributor limited by COI rules can't directly improve the page. Various awards and other sources establish notability. IMHO the filmmaker is wrong about the purpose of this article, it is not supposed to mirror everything in his self-published bio. Of course this bio (=personal website) is linked in the infobox. Even a stub would be better than nothing and help users (including Googlebot) to figure out basic facts (Canada, awards, vimeo account, etc.) The article is already far better than a stub and further improvements incl. a filmography are planned or discussed on the talk page. This all or nothing AFD makes no sense for me. –84.46.52.190 (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in no way so notable that we should keep the article against the subject's wish.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: ongoing relevant discussion at teahouse. This appears to be an overreaction to unsourced info being removed. But perhaps a related notability discussion is in order. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the Christmas teahouse discussion with the artist is already archived and presumably matches the OTRS request. –84.46.53.207 (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I accepted this article from AFC, he is borderline notable so thought it might survive an AFD, but if the subject would rather it was deleted, I have no issue with that. Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Delete''' in no way so notable that we should keep the article against the subject's wish.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 20:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 :{{comment}} ongoing relevant discussion at [[Wikipedia:Teahouse#Clarification_please_for_adding_a_filmography|teahouse]]. This appears to be an overreaction to unsourced info being removed. But perhaps a related notability discussion is in order. [[User:Timtempleton|<b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b>]] [[User talk:Timtempleton|<sup style="color:#800080">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Timtempleton|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 21:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
+::Thanks, the Christmas [[WP:TEA|teahouse]] discussion with the artist is already [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1040#how_do_I_request_a_deletion_of_a_wikipedia_page_about_me?|archived]] and presumably matches the OTRS request. &ndash;[[Special:Contributions/84.46.53.207|84.46.53.207]] ([[User talk:84.46.53.207|talk]]) 19:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 *{{Comment}} I accepted this article from AFC, he is borderline notable so thought it might survive an AFD, but if the subject would rather it was deleted, I have no issue with that. [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 17:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)