User talk:184.54.163.113: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:08, 17 January 2020

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Media conglomerate. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (184.54.163.113) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Kaizenify (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viacom Velocity (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article includes no independent sources - just the company's website. See WP:CORPDEPTH for a discussion of the sourcing requirements for articles about companies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viacom Velocity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viacom Velocity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 08:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 184.54.163.113! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GirthSummit _(blether) 08:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viacom Velocity (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The source provided is not independent. We need significant coverage from WP:Secondary, reliable sources. Pls read WP:NCORP for notability requirements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viacom Velocity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viacom Velocity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Regarding this edit summary: Please remember to be civil when interacting with other editors. Trivialist (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Disney acquisitions has been accepted

List of Disney acquisitions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Viacom Velocity concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Viacom Velocity, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Know that I’m responding to an automated message, so about the AFC, I am going to accept its deletion, I reviewed through the reasoning behind denying the request, and I think with limited information, it doesn’t belong here.

Revision as of 01:25, 10 January 2020 edit HasteurBot (talk \| contribs) 436,622 edits m User:HasteurBot: Notification of CSD:G13 potential nomination of Draft:Viacom Velocity ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:08, 17 January 2020 edit undo 184.54.163.113 (talk) →Draft:Viacom Velocity concern Next edit →
Line 82:		Line 82:

	Thank you for your attention. [[User:HasteurBot\|HasteurBot]] ([[User talk:HasteurBot\|talk]]) 01:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)		Thank you for your attention. [[User:HasteurBot\|HasteurBot]] ([[User talk:HasteurBot\|talk]]) 01:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
			::I Know that I’m responding to an automated message, so about the AFC, I am going to accept its deletion, I reviewed through the reasoning behind denying the request, and I think with limited information, it doesn’t belong here.