User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus: Difference between revisions
→Tribe Capital deleted page: Reply |
|||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
[[User:Inkforest|Inkforest]] ([[User talk:Inkforest|talk]]) 14:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:Inkforest|Inkforest]] ([[User talk:Inkforest|talk]]) 14:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Greetings, {{U|Inkforest}}. Based on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribe Capital]] it seems like the fairly strict requirements of [[WP:NCORP]] were not met. In my opinion, the first step would be to make sure that you have multiple reliable sources which meet both the [[WP:ORGDEPTH]] and [[WP:ORGIND]] criteria. If you can find several such sources, the next step would be to write a draft at [[Draft:Tribe Capital]] with them and send it to [[WP:AFC]]. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus#top|talk]]) 14:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
:Greetings, {{U|Inkforest}}. Based on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribe Capital]] it seems like the fairly strict requirements of [[WP:NCORP]] were not met. In my opinion, the first step would be to make sure that you have multiple reliable sources which meet both the [[WP:ORGDEPTH]] and [[WP:ORGIND]] criteria. If you can find several such sources, the next step would be to write a draft at [[Draft:Tribe Capital]] with them and send it to [[WP:AFC]]. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus#top|talk]]) 14:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Thank you, {{U|Jo-Jo Eumerus}}! I believe that I have multiple reliable sources which meet the [[WP:ORGDEPTH]] and [[WP:ORGIND]] criteria. I will take the next step of writing a draft. [[User:Inkforest|Inkforest]] ([[User talk:Inkforest|talk]]) 14:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:37, 8 April 2020
This is Jo-Jo Eumerus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
(Talk page watcher comments welcome) Note to self
Review this question, it will be archived in two days! |
Been wondering if [2][3][4] are enough to make this often-cited photo of the 2019–20 Australian bushfire season notable under WP:GNG terms. There are other passing mentions in this Google hit list. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Slow websites for citoid
I forgot to get back to you about that citoid problem. I asked one of the devs to take a look, and she said that cambridge.org was working fine for her. Is it still slow for you? (Please ping me; my watchlist is hopeless.) Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF): I haven't noticed that issue anymore (the only issue remaining with Cambridge is that it doesn't see year dates). The main issue I currently have on Wikimedia is this one, which is intermittent but quite irritating. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's amazing that we don't see more complaints about slow connections, given the changes in traffic patterns (e.g., away cloud-based slideware in large offices to streaming video in residential areas). Or maybe people don't complain, because they notice that it affects all sites.
- Does that problem go away if you turn off all syntax highlighting? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):It can't be turned off on the edit screen once the bug starts. It's an intermittent issue which crops out on one page, disappears there after a while, then months later reappears on another. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- And it disappears in mw:safemode, so the problem is in a user script/gadget somewhere, but which one(s)? When the problem appears, are you able to edit other pages? I think if the problem appears on page #1, and you turn off syntax highlighting in page #2, and then go back to page #1, it should still be turned off. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):Other pages, yes. I can't test which scripts (although I did remove some scripts from my common.js without success) as the bug is not currently active. But as I noted before, it has done this disappearing act (on Laguna del Maule (volcano)) on other articles. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):It happened again, on Invisible Man. Syntax highlighter was off, I can edit other pages. Note also that when I use tabbing to edit it appears to edit, but when you save it saves nothing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- If it is a script in User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/common.js that's causing the problem it must be User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck.js as removing that fixes the issue. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):It happened again, on Invisible Man. Syntax highlighter was off, I can edit other pages. Note also that when I use tabbing to edit it appears to edit, but when you save it saves nothing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):Other pages, yes. I can't test which scripts (although I did remove some scripts from my common.js without success) as the bug is not currently active. But as I noted before, it has done this disappearing act (on Laguna del Maule (volcano)) on other articles. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- And it disappears in mw:safemode, so the problem is in a user script/gadget somewhere, but which one(s)? When the problem appears, are you able to edit other pages? I think if the problem appears on page #1, and you turn off syntax highlighting in page #2, and then go back to page #1, it should still be turned off. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Whatamidoing (WMF):It can't be turned off on the edit screen once the bug starts. It's an intermittent issue which crops out on one page, disappears there after a while, then months later reappears on another. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Andagua volcanic field
The article Andagua volcanic field you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Andagua volcanic field for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Coral Patch Seamount
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coral Patch Seamount you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Andagua volcanic field
The article Andagua volcanic field you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andagua volcanic field for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 16:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Paleotempestology
The article Paleotempestology you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paleotempestology for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Sandbox
Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, there was an AfD taking place for Omar Alaa Mubarak that I wasn’t aware of. I don’t think the deletion discussion consensus was accurate since participating editors were basing their opinion on English sources while there was Arabic news articles covering him as the main subject (not through a father or grandfather). Can you send a version of the deleted article into my sandbox that I can work on?Bechtoll (talk) 06:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Greetings, Bechtoll. I've sent it to User:Bechtoll/Omar Alaa Mubarak. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NW Rota-1 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- There was a problem with user pages not being shown properly on desktop. This was because of a bug. It will soon be fixed. [5]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 April. It will be on all wikis from 9 April (calendar).
Future changes
- MediaWiki will use a newer version of Unicode. Some characters that did not have an upper case equivalent before do now. Titles beginning with one of these characters will be moved. A list of these titles can be seen on Phabricator. The titles will be renamed by the user
Maintenance script
. This will start on 13 April 2020. You can rename them before this if you wish and the new title can be different from the one the script would rename it to. [6]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Please reopen this discussion, or, better yet, simply restore the article. "Alice Hyatt" is the protagonist of Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, a seminal Martin Scorsese film with major award recognition, as well as a long-running TV series. Ellen Burstyn won BAFTA and Academy Awards for her portrayal of the character; Linda Lavin was nominated for or won Emmy and Golden Globe awards for playing the TV version. To say that critical commentary on the character could not be found defies even the slightest credibility -- especially since cursory GBooks and GScholar searches turn up substantive commentary on the very first pages of results. This deletion serves no purpose except to embarass Wikipedia. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Hullaballoo Wolfowitz:Seems like you have a good case; I've restored and reopened it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Espenberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Tribe Capital deleted page
Hi,
I would like to add a page for Tribe Capital and I saw that it was previously deleted. It was advised that I reach out to you about the deleted page.
I'm not sure the contents of the previous article, but I expect to create a high quality, well-cited article for Tribe.
Please let me know how best to proceed. This is the first time I would be dealing with a previously deleted page, so your advice would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Inkforest (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Greetings, Inkforest. Based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribe Capital it seems like the fairly strict requirements of WP:NCORP were not met. In my opinion, the first step would be to make sure that you have multiple reliable sources which meet both the WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND criteria. If you can find several such sources, the next step would be to write a draft at Draft:Tribe Capital with them and send it to WP:AFC. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Jo-Jo Eumerus! I believe that I have multiple reliable sources which meet the WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND criteria. I will take the next step of writing a draft. Inkforest (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)