Jump to content

Talk:Psy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 48: Line 48:


:::{{reply to|43.239.157.198}} Like {{u|Deacon Vorbis}} already said, the information is not supported in the article. Per [[WP:CATV]], {{tq| Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories.}} and this award is not mentioned at all in the article. Adding the category would be adding unsourced information. Other artists receiving this award has absolutely nothing to do with ''this'' article or its categories. [[User:Alexanderlee|Alex ]] ([[User talk:Alexanderlee|talk]]) 14:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
:::{{reply to|43.239.157.198}} Like {{u|Deacon Vorbis}} already said, the information is not supported in the article. Per [[WP:CATV]], {{tq| Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories.}} and this award is not mentioned at all in the article. Adding the category would be adding unsourced information. Other artists receiving this award has absolutely nothing to do with ''this'' article or its categories. [[User:Alexanderlee|Alex ]] ([[User talk:Alexanderlee|talk]]) 14:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

:::{{reply to|Alexanderlee}} The info is genuine and solid. Or else you can ask Psy yourself if this award is a good recognitin in his K-pop career. If as you said, I quote, "this award is not mentioned at all in the article", then pls add a sentence in this article stating "Psy was 2013 Korea Image Awards Winners for his work in promoting Korea's work to the world" with reference to the external link [http://www.theasian.asia/archives/53845 Psy wins Korea Image Award]. Simply decline the request and do nothing to refine doen't seem to be the spirit of wikipedia. It also hurts people who wants to contibute to the completeness of information.

Revision as of 14:14, 3 May 2020

Template:Vital article

new song,

HIs new song came out and already broken records, guess it's time to update the page.

Last Line Paragraph 2 in the Intro

This should be changed to reflect that as of September 2017 this is now the third most watched youtube video of all time, not second.

Please confirm.

Requesting Edit be made

Hi,

I was wondering if an edit could be added to the end of "unexpected international breakthrough". The information came from an article from EBSCO Host. I copied the edit I wanted to add down below.

"The breakthrough that Psy managed to accomplish on YouTube was not only a huge accomplishment for him, but it was also an accomplishment for the KPop community. Gangnam Style was able to bring awareness to the music genre, internationally, to other people that may not have been aware of it and contributed to the Hallyu Wave.[1]"

Ju, Hyejung; Lee, Soobum (2015). "The Korean Wave and Asian Americans: the ethnic meanings of transnational Korean pop culture in the USA". Journal of Media & Cultural Studies. 29: 323–338. doi:10.1080/10304312.2014.986059 – via EBSCO Host.

HerreraJules (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)HerreraJules[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2020

add Category: Korea Image Awards Winners 36.231.136.55 (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Not supported in the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Deacon Vorbis: Why? Psy is 2013 Korea Image Awards Winner, see this reference: Psy wins Korea Image Award , Korea Image Awards Winners also include Rain_(entertainer), Ban Ki-moon, AlphaGo, Samsung Galaxy, SK Telecom etc. Do you think Psy is so good that the Korea Image Awards doesn't deserve him and if so why he took it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.239.157.198 (talkcontribs) 14:05, May 3, 2020 (UTC)
@43.239.157.198: Like Deacon Vorbis already said, the information is not supported in the article. Per WP:CATV, Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. and this award is not mentioned at all in the article. Adding the category would be adding unsourced information. Other artists receiving this award has absolutely nothing to do with this article or its categories. Alex (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexanderlee: The info is genuine and solid. Or else you can ask Psy yourself if this award is a good recognitin in his K-pop career. If as you said, I quote, "this award is not mentioned at all in the article", then pls add a sentence in this article stating "Psy was 2013 Korea Image Awards Winners for his work in promoting Korea's work to the world" with reference to the external link Psy wins Korea Image Award. Simply decline the request and do nothing to refine doen't seem to be the spirit of wikipedia. It also hurts people who wants to contibute to the completeness of information.