User talk:Erminwin: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Non-correlation between statement and sources: new section |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
[[User:Bookku|Bookku]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:Bookku|Bookku]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 11:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Non-correlation between statement and sources == |
|||
Hi, the recent sock-edits, including the whole sequence in the leading part #Origins, about the proto-turkic homeland simply isn’t backed up by the sources. There is not one sentence in the given references. You have to check the sources before you allow abusive sockcontent. However, considering the context of that „Transeurasian theory“, an absolute minority view among linguists, these studies belong to the article [[Altaic languages]]. Yours thankfully —[[User:Lithuist|Lithuist]] ([[User talk:Lithuist|talk]]) 08:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:46, 31 May 2020
Nice work!
The WikiCookie | ||
You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Erminwin (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Erminwin, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Erminwin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uyghur Khaganate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Tai peoples,...
I am informing you that the fanatic tai-only user has striked again. He is currently reverting your edits and claim that you are aswell, like many other non-related users, a sockpuppet... 213.162.72.195 (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- GAB is closing that the sockpuppet investigation proposed by that Tai-only user (most likely User:Bokworm8899). Still, I decide not to revert their edits for fear of starting an edit war.Erminwin (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for November 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shad (prince), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barsils, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
remember Wiki's tenant: Verifiability, Not Truth
Sometimes the Reliable Sources may seem questionable, but we can't just drive-by change article text without a Reliable Source to back it up. HammerFilmFan (talk) 04:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @HammerFilmFan: The "Reliable Source" John Chambers's "The Devil's Horsemen" did not identify the "Saxins" (p. 48, 49) / "Saxin tribes" (p. 31) with "East Saxons".Erminwin (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- better read the footnotes more closely - the revamping of this article was done in collaboration with 2 professors who authored books on the Mongols, besides my own colleagues at Duke
- Do you have an RS that has a better definition of "Saxins"? This article has been vandalized by drive-by IP's from Russia, etc., since we re-vamped it a few years ago - I am not sure without digging through the history of where the definition was obtained-several other history buffs have tried to fix the article when this happened, and it's possible a reference was lost-Chambers does indeed not directly define who they were-this may have come from email correspondence from Morgan, or Trumble. I am all in favor of improving this article. I'm going to search through my various sources in the meantime. Thanks. HammerFilmFan (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @HammerFilmFan: Hudud al-'Alam 'The Regions of the World' - A Persian Geography 372 A.H. (982 AD), by V. V. Minorsky & C. E. Bosworth would be such a RS. Minorsky wrote that: "The first element of Sārigh-sh.n is evidently Turkish [sic] sarigh "yellow" [...] I am strongly inclined that the name *Sarigh-shin is the original form of the enigmatic [...] Saqsin, as the geographer of Mongol times called a town situated by a mighty river and usually quoted along with the Volga Bulghar, cf. Bartold Saķsīn in EI." (italic in original)
Sock IP of Bookworm8899 seems to be back
Hello, the long term vandal and Tai only pusher Bookworm8899 seems to be back adding unsourced maps made by his sock on wikimedia. He is currently using several IPs. As example please see Vietnamese language. Greetings.38.121.43.37 (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- Well, you already cleaned up his vandalism. So... good job! Erminwin (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurykans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashina Helu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khalaj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western Turkic Khaganate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khalaj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Hephthalites (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Indo-Iranian
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Xueyantuo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Tola and Chuluo Khagan
- Chigi family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to IPA
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Requesting copy edit support
Hi,
Season's greetings
I am looking for proactive copy edit support/input help any of the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.
Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Turkestan
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-correlation between statement and sources
Hi, the recent sock-edits, including the whole sequence in the leading part #Origins, about the proto-turkic homeland simply isn’t backed up by the sources. There is not one sentence in the given references. You have to check the sources before you allow abusive sockcontent. However, considering the context of that „Transeurasian theory“, an absolute minority view among linguists, these studies belong to the article Altaic languages. Yours thankfully —Lithuist (talk) 08:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)